19 Jan
2016
19 Jan
'16
6:53 p.m.
It looks good from a parent/child perspective, especially for the URL
preserving and the redirect. Thanks Guillaume for your work.
Now I guess the migrator should also cover/test the rights (unfortunately
design.xwiki.org doesn't have anything special regarding Rights to you
might need another test case).
Thanks,
Caty
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 7:34 PM, Guillaume "Louis-Marie" Delhumeau <
gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Hi.
I have released a first alpha version of the application:
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Nested+Pages+Migrator+…
This application allows to compute a plan of actions to do to perform a
migration from terminal pages to nested pages. The current version does not
propose to apply this plan so it is only available for testing purpose.
Current limitations:
- The plan is not applied yet.
- The preferences and the configured rights are not converted yet.
- 2 pages can have the same target location.
- There is no real pagination
You should test it on a wiki containing a lot of documents. You need to
upgrade your wiki to a version handling Nested Pages before using the
application.
Sometimes, the parent/based relationship between pages is messy. For
example, I have run this script before using my tool on a local copy of
design.xwiki.org because a lot of pages had Main.WebHome as parent
meanwhile it was not justified:
{{velocity}}
#set ($xwql = "where doc.space in ('Proposal', 'Design',
'Improvements')
and doc.parent = 'Main.WebHome'")
#foreach($r in $services.query.xwql($xwql).execute())
* $r
#set ($d = $xwiki.getDocument($r))
#set ($discard = $d.setParent('Proposal.WebHome'))
#set ($discard = $d.save())
#end
{{/velocity}}
The UI is a single-page application that handles some options that I let
you discover.
I hope you will have some time to test it and that you will like the tool.
Thanks for your feedbacks,
Guillaume
2016-01-13 12:54 GMT+01:00 Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <valicac(a)gmail.com>om>:
For
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Proposal+Application
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/FlamingoAddMenuLocationIter…
the
how
type
> > > message, example
> > > http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/XWikiOrg
.
will
applications
to
it.
the
come
you
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Guillaume Delhumeau (gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
Committer on the XWiki.org project
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
Hi Guillaume,
Thanks for your answer.
9. Proposing to create a backup depends on how the user will start the
migration tool. If the migration is automatic, than we should create an
automated backup. If it's on demand, then we need to suggest to the user
to
create one before.
12. The issue is for the migration process to not be stuck when
encountering problematic pages and at the end to provide a list of failed
pages in order for the Administrator to investigate and fix them.
Thank you Guillaume,
Caty
On Wed, Jan 13, 2016 at 1:05 PM, Guillaume "Louis-Marie" Delhumeau <
gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
page.
Hi Caty and thanks for your detailed answer.
design.xwiki.org seems to
be
a
perfect sample to test and develop this migration tool.
Now, let's see point by point.
1. The idea is to have breadcrumbs perfectly identical (ISO) after the
migration. However, I was just considering moving the pages from a
location
to an other, not completely renaming them. I
think renaming using the
title
(which could be velocity code in some places) is
out of the scope and
could
be covered by... an other refactoring tool!
2. Back-links (in the content) will be updated like it usually happens
when
we rename a page from the UI. We should make sure
the tool use the
existing
mechanism. However, I'm quite sure it
won't affect objects properties.
3. Bookmarks won't be broken if we add a redirection to the new page at
the
old location. Fortunately, Marius have added this
feature in 7.4:
http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-3622
4. Yes, converting terminal pages to nested pages in the core principle
of
> this tool. It gives the ability to create children to any existing Of
update
course, this change should not be done on
technical documents, and even
in
> data generated by applications. Otherwise, this application could be
> broken.
>
> 5. I need to see if image references are affected by the backlinks feature
we already have. Same for macro parameters.
6. URL will be long, yes. I don't think URL aliases are planned for 8.0
and
it's sure that we won't have them in
7.4.x.
8. Your queries should continue to work, since I propose to update the
"parent" field when the parent is renamed. Nested pages will still have
the
same parent. However, it would be safer to use a
query looking at the
nested children similar to the one of the children viewer.
9. IMO, we could only propose to generate a full back-up XAR (with
history,
author preserved, etc...) but it's not the
scope of this tool to manage
backups.
10. I think it's ok to not handle documents from the recycle bin.
Moreover,
it will be still possible to run again the tool
after some pages have
been
> restored so they eventually reach their ideal location.
>
> 11. Adding a white list of spaces to convert could be a great option. > technical documents, for need to create
filters. For example: do not
> convert hidden pages, or pages having some objects of some classes.
>
> 12. Moving pages holding a lot of attachments is a problem. See:
> http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-8910
>
> This tool won't fix bugs that we have for ages. It means we should
report
> any failures during the process in a list
that we show to the user. I'm
> afraid the perfect tool cannot be made and users will still have manual
> things to do - but at least this tool will make them saving time.
>
> Is that OK for you?
>
> Any other opinion?
>
> Thanks,
> Guillaume
>
>
> 2016-01-12 18:30 GMT+01:00 Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
valicac(a)gmail.com
>:
>
> > 12. When I moved the pages from incubator to design.xwiki.org I
mostly
> > used
> > scripts. But I had some problems for pages that contain lots of
> > attachments, like
> >
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/Skin4x#Attachments
> > Those pages I needed to import with
Large import or something, and
some
> > even recreated manually. To be honest I
don't quite remember, but
just
be
> > careful that the migrator needs to consider cases when pages cannot
be
>
renamed / deleted / etc.
>
> Thanks,
> Caty
>
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 7:26 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
> valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > The following ideas are about the Parent/Children relation (UC1):
> >
> > For example a copy of design.xwiki.org could be used as a test
example
> for
this kind of migration. design.xwiki.org is using a very basic
> application
>
> > > that at its core uses the
Parent/Child relation in order to list
in a
> >
livetable the children of a particular proposal.
> >
> > The hierarchy contains pages from 2 spaces: Improvements (from the
old
>
application from incubator.myxwiki.org) and Proposal.
>
> Sometimes the hierarchy can go to more than 6 levels, examples:
>
> >
or http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/XWiki+Icon+Set
> >
> > But sometimes the hierarchy mixes pages from the different spaces,
> > example:
> > http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/PanelsImprovements
> (where
> > Flamingo comes from Improvements space, while the others are from
> Proposal
> > space).
> >
> > User expectations:
> > 1. I would really like that after the migration the hierarchy to
remain
> > > the same a.k.a the breadcrumb to be unchanged. The breadcrumb
> navigation
> > > stays at the core of this application. I give more importance to Page
> > Title than the Page Name, so I would be ok for the new pages to be
> copied /
> > created using the title and discard the page name.
> > 2. But I sometimes referenciate in the content of some proposals
other
>
pages using the page name references. So what will happen to those
links?
> > Can we auto-update them inside the content with the new pages
> (backlinks)?
> > 3. in your UC7: Bookmarks should not be broken after the migration: > can
we achieve this? Are the page aliases a solution? Everywhere on
jira
> there are references with links towards the
design.xwiki.org
proposals.
> > For example, when I moved the app from incubator.myxwiki.org to
> > design.xwiki.org I replaced the content of the page with a Moved This
images
> could be a solution if we don't provide
page aliases or redirects,
although
> might not be very efficient.
> 4. In order to achieve the hierarchy this means that terminal pages
need
> to be transformed into spaces?
> 5. In my proposals I use the {{gallery}} macro that uses references
like
> > "image:loginDesktopSnapshotAnnotations.png" or
> > "image:Skin4xMenus@menusMenuAnnotations.png", etc. How will the
> be
> > affected?
> > 6. Those long URL will look kind of ugly - so again page aliases
would
be
Proposal
> > App
> > > in order to continue working as before? Do we provide such
> documentation
> > > for the users?
> > > 8. The livetable was using this in order to list the children
> > > #set ($discard = $options.put('extraParams', "&
> > > parent=${doc.fullName}"))
> > > and
> > > #set ($importPages = $xwiki.queryManager.xwql("where
> > > doc.parent='$doc'").execute())
> > > 9. If the user might start and finish the migration but then he > great. But not sure how we will manage them.
Do we allow multiple
aliases
> > to be created and used, or just 1?
> > 7. What is the complexity of the changes I need to add to the > > > discover that everything looks
bad, what can he do? A best practice
> would
> > > be for him to make a backup before doing the migration, but can't
we
make
Apparently
> one automatically?
> 10. After the migration what will happen if an user goes to the
'Recycle
> Bin' and restores a page from
"Deleted Documents" or "Deleted
Attachments"?
> 11. Currently there are 1246 pages on the Design wiki. Improvements
space
> > contains 317 pages, while Proposal space contains 256 pages. > > there are other spaces that contain
user generated content like
Design,
> > > Tech, Standard, etc spaces. It would be great if the migrator could
> list
> > > user created pages when the migrator ask what pages needs to be
> migrated
> > > (UC3). But that list should eliminate default pages and > > pages
> > > (technical). Also maybe the user wants to migrate the hierarchy
just
for
> > some pages (just the spaces Proposal and Improvements).
> >
> > I know maybe the design.xwiki.org is not the best or the most
complex
> > > example, but as an user I am quite concerned with what will happen > the
> > > hierarchy we've created over the years and I'm sure every user
thinks
> the
> > > same about their content.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Caty
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Tue, Jan 12, 2016 at 6:37 PM, Guillaume "Louis-Marie"
Delhumeau
<
> gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone.
>>
>> I am working on a tool to help the user migrating from an XWiki
instance
> >> without the Nested Pages feature to a new version (7.4.x) handling > >>
> >> This tool would be an extension that the administrator can install
and
> >> execute *after* the XWiki upgrade
have been done. After its
execution,
> >> users should be able to create
children to every existing pages
(that
> > was
> > >> previously terminal, obviously). But the old hierarchy based on >
>> parent/child relationship, and all the preferences and rights,
should
be
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/UpgradeToNestedPages
> > >>
> > >> I've started this document before talking here in order to not
>> preserved. The URL should not be broken
neither.
>>
>> I have started a design document with the use-cases I had in mind.
I've
>> also suggested some implementations and
drew some mock-ups. The
results
> is
> >> here:
> >> > with
> > >> nothing, but feel free to add other use-cases, ideas, and
edge-cases
>
that
> >> I
> >> haven't listed. We should also identify any blocking point from
XWiki
> > >> Enterprise that we could fix in a 7.4.x version.
> > >>
> > >> Do you have any question in mind that we should discuss here? Do
have
>> an opinion on this?
>>
>> You help is warmly welcome,
>>
>> Thanks,
>> --
>> Guillaume Delhumeau (gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
>> Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
>> Committer on the XWiki.org project
>> _______________________________________________
>> devs mailing list
>> devs(a)xwiki.org
>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>>
>
>
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Guillaume Delhumeau (gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
Committer on the XWiki.org project
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs