On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 18:00, Jerome Velociter <jerome(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Hi all,
The subject has been discussed already, see for example
http://markmail.org/message/h5e2qinrhsf2slww
The idea is to create a new top level project for modules (modules in
the sense of everything applications, macros, components, plugins, skin
extensions, etc.) that are not part of any products (or the platform)
and that are not necessarily contributed by the XWiki development team.
The difference with the sandbox is that sandbox is a place for modules
being incubated, and that are not in a finished state. Thus, I think one
of the rule for introducing new modules in the xlet repository would be
that a functional version of the module should be released and available
for download (for example on
code.xwiki.org).
The name "xlet" is the name we've use historically to talk about this
repository, this is open for discussion. (personally I like the name -
we have to agree this is how we want to name a XWiki "pluggable module"
in the large sense).
Here is my +1 for the above
I would also like to propose that we create a new category of JIRA
projects : "XWiki Contributed Xlets" (or equivalent name) for such
projects that desire to track issues for their released module, and have
the tracker hosted by
XWiki.org. I believe this will make easier to have
real release cycles for such modules (for example, we can link to the
JIRA project from the
code.xwiki.org "module" page so that users can
report issues instead of using the comments, we can use JIRAs changelog
for release notes on the download page, etc.)
And my +1 for this second proposal
Please, let me know what you think
Jerome.
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs