On 11 Feb 2016 at 16:41:23, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
(valicac@gmail.com(mailto:valicac@gmail.com)) wrote:
To be honest I would love that this info would be in
e.x.o.
On git we have a link to the website of the app. There we could put all the
info inside the Repository app.
Otherwise we will duplicate information, have it desync, etc.
@Caty, this is what I mentioned already in my mail. So far, Guillaume said he preferred
not to do this and have explicit info instead.
Also note that we need the README anyway **for now** since the Repository app (and what’s
installed on exo) is missing a lot of the needed info (see details in my first mail).
Unless you think it’s better to not have anything at all till the Repository app on exo is
updated (which might possibly be in a long time in the future).
I’m open to both ideas as I mentioned in my initial mails.
Thanks
-Vincent
Thanks,
Caty
On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 1:24 PM, Thomas Mortagne
wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 11, 2016 at 12:09 PM, vincent(a)massol.net
> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On 11 Feb 2016 at 12:07:45, Eduard Moraru (enygma2002(a)gmail.com) wrote:
> >
> > +1. It`s always good to have some guidance.
> >
> > Also, the project lead field should be a bit more useful than a name.
> Maybe
> > github account, IRC handle or something like this might be useful as
> well,
> > as a means of contacting the person. It won`t always be well known XWiki
> > committers there.
> >
> >
> > Link to the
xwiki.org user profile page? (there the user can put
> whatever info he wants to be found)
>
> We should probably add a field in the profile for the github account.
>
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > -Vincent
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Eduard
> >
> > On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 4:03 PM, vincent(a)massol.net
> > wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> On 10 Feb 2016 at 15:01:54, Thomas Mortagne (thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com)
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >> +1 to provide this template on
contrib.xwiki.org as a best practice
> >> for those who want to use it but not a big fan of making it a rule
> >> Yes it would be an ecouraged best practice.
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> -Vincent
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 2:55 PM, Guillaume Delhumeau
> >> wrote:
> >> > +1 for the first proposal. Having informations in the github repo is
> more
> >> > friendly.
> >> >
> >> > 2016-02-10 14:53 GMT+01:00 vincent(a)massol.net :
> >> >
> >> >> Hi Alex,
> >> >>
> >> >> On 10 Feb 2016 at 14:43:53, Alexandru Cotiuga (
> >> alexandru.cotiuga(a)xwiki.com
> >> >> (mailto:alexandru.cotiuga@xwiki.com)) wrote:
> >> >>
> >> >> > + 1
> >> >> > I would also propose to add the Java version needed for
release
> >> (instead
> >> >> of
> >> >> > digging in the hierarchy to find out this information)
> >> >>
> >> >> I don’t agree. I think we should only put the minimal number of
> >> >> information as it’s very tedious to ensure that the info is in
sync.
> >> Right
> >> >> now I’ve put only what I think is the minimal info. Also the Java
> >> version
> >> >> is checked during the build so you cannot have it wrong.
> >> >>
> >> >> OTOH I see there’s a link to Translations on l10n. I think that’s
a
> good
> >> >> idea for apps that support internationalization. Would be
optional.
> >> >>
> >> >> > and maybe there are
> >> >> > some other particular steps to follow when a release is
performed.
> >> >>
> >> >> The template is about the minimal that need to be displayed. We
> should
> >> >> mention that of course each repo should add whatever information
it
> >> >> needs/wants to that README.
> >> >>
> >> >> > A good
> >> >> > example would be:
> >> >> >
> >> >>
> >>
>
https://github.com/xwiki-contrib/application-filemanager/blob/master/README…
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks
> >> >> -Vincent
> >> >>