11 Jan
2006
11 Jan
'06
10:37 p.m.
Ok agreed but that's going to be a good test of componentization.. The
WYSIWYG editor has several hooks:
1/ Edit menu links, Question mark link
2/ XWiki and user Preferences
3/ Forms code
4/ Forms prefs
5/ static code in webapp directory
We can make it separate in JIRA, but I think compenentizing should be a
1.1 or 2.0 task after the maven migration
Ludovic
Hans Gerwitz a écrit :
I agree that WYSIWYG should be considered an
app/plugin if at all
possible. There are many options out there and an advocate of a
different one should be able to offer theirs as an alternative.
It is a critical one, though, for adoption. And perhaps in-place
sectional editing will someday make it impossible to abstract the tool
away; but I don't think that's true, yet.
- - -
Hans Gerwitz
http://phobia.com/
On Jan 11, 2006, at 10:04 AM, jeremi joslin wrote:
--
Ludovic Dubost
XPertNet: http://www.xpertnet.fr/
Blog: http://www.ludovic.org/blog/
XWiki: http://www.xwiki.com
Skype: ldubost AIM: nvludo Yahoo: ludovic
Ludovic,
I just think the WYSIWYG is an application because some of us will
don't use it and it's not necessary for running XWiki. It's usefull
but not necessary.
But it can be view to carry out the editing function which is a basic
function of the wiki so it can be considered as a full member of the
core.
Jeremi
On 1/11/06, Ludovic Dubost <ludovic(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
You receive this message as a subscriber of the xwiki-dev(a)objectweb.org mailing list.
To unsubscribe: mailto:xwiki-dev-unsubscribe@objectweb.org
For general help: mailto:sympa@objectweb.org?subject=help
ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws
I agree too.. Too much spliting won't be clear..
WYSIWYG isn't an application from my stand point. It's part of the core
product release.
I've create a filter for 1.0 Beta 1
http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?mode=hide&request…
I suggest all members of this list add tasks to this list that they
WANT
to see in the next release.
Remember we want this release out the door quickly, so don't put
features that we don't NEED right away !
This release should focus on:
- the WYSIWYG Editor
- simplicity
- major bugs
- installer
Ludovic
Hans Gerwitz a écrit :
--
Blog: http://www.jeremi.info
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1437724
http://www.xwiki.org
skype: jeremi23 -- msn et gtalk : jeremi23(a)gmail.com
--
You receive this message as a subscriber of the
xwiki-dev(a)objectweb.org mailing list.
To unsubscribe: mailto:xwiki-dev-unsubscribe@objectweb.org
For general help: mailto:sympa@objectweb.org?subject=help
ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws +1 to all
I think plugins and applications will not only be intertwined, but
that the distinction is lost on nontechnical users. I recommend
considering plugins a component of applications.
- - -
Hans Gerwitz
http://phobia.com/
On Jan 11, 2006, at 6:44 AM, jeremi joslin wrote:
> Hi,
> I will try to do my best to help Ludovic to lead the project because
> he is very busy.
>
> I've started to review Jira tasks to find what we need to fix before
> the release.
>
> 1. I propose to split in Jira the XWiki project in 2 or 3 projects:
> * XWiki core (which is written in java) and the minimum UI (When you
> run XWiki with a blank DB)
> * XWiki plugins (also written in java, for exemple: feed plugin, mail
> plugin ...)
> * XWiki applications (in script language like groovy or velocity, for
> example: blog, photo album, wysiwyg...)
> the last too can be one because some applications can have a plugin
> like the feed plugin which have also an application.
>
> Like this, we can release the core without all the application and
> vice versa. Because many of you don't need the applications.
>
>
> 2. For next iterations before the release :
> - 1.0 B1
> - 1.0 B2
> - 1.0 RC1
> - 1.0 RC2
> - 1.0
>
> 3. I will do a summary in few days of the work to do before the
> release and propose you a road map.
>
> What do you think about it? I think, we can use the apache voting
> system (for those who don't know it:
> http://www.apache.org/foundation/voting.html)
>
> Jérémi
> --
> Blog: http://www.jeremi.info
> LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/profile?viewProfile=&key=1437724
> http://www.xwiki.org
> skype: jeremi23 -- msn et gtalk : jeremi23(a)gmail.com
>
>
> --
> You receive this message as a subscriber of the
> xwiki-dev(a)objectweb.org mailing list.
> To unsubscribe: mailto:xwiki-dev-unsubscribe@objectweb.org
> For general help: mailto:sympa@objectweb.org?subject=help
> ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page:
> http://www.objectweb.org/wws
------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
You receive this message as a subscriber of the
xwiki-dev(a)objectweb.org mailing list.
To unsubscribe: mailto:xwiki-dev-unsubscribe@objectweb.org
For general help: mailto:sympa@objectweb.org?subject=help
ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page:
http://www.objectweb.org/wws
--
Ludovic Dubost
XPertNet: http://www.xpertnet.fr/
Blog: http://www.ludovic.org/blog/
XWiki: http://www.xwiki.com
Skype: ldubost AIM: nvludo Yahoo: ludovic
--
You receive this message as a subscriber of the
xwiki-dev(a)objectweb.org mailing list.
To unsubscribe: mailto:xwiki-dev-unsubscribe@objectweb.org
For general help: mailto:sympa@objectweb.org?subject=help
ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws