12 Jun
2008
12 Jun
'08
7:47 a.m.
On Jun 12, 2008, at 1:53 AM, sdumitriu (SVN) wrote:
Author: sdumitriu
Date: 2008-06-12 01:53:06 +0200 (Thu, 12 Jun 2008)
New Revision: 10270
Modified:
xwiki-products/xwiki-enterprise/trunk/distribution-test/selenium-
tests/src/test/it/com/xpn/xwiki/it/selenium/WikiEditorTest.java
Log:
[misc] Added a comment
Modified: xwiki-products/xwiki-enterprise/trunk/distribution-test/
selenium-tests/src/test/it/com/xpn/xwiki/it/selenium/
WikiEditorTest.java
===================================================================
--- xwiki-products/xwiki-enterprise/trunk/distribution-test/selenium-
tests/src/test/it/com/xpn/xwiki/it/selenium/WikiEditorTest.java
2008-06-11 23:51:17 UTC (rev 10269)
+++ xwiki-products/xwiki-enterprise/trunk/distribution-test/selenium-
tests/src/test/it/com/xpn/xwiki/it/selenium/WikiEditorTest.java
2008-06-11 23:53:06 UTC (rev 10270)
@@ -159,6 +159,9 @@
// TODO: We need to find out how to make a text selection in
Selenium
}
+ /**
+ * See XWIKI-1007
+ */
Personally I don't like referring to JIRA issues like this because:
1) the reader has to navigate to the issue to understand what it is
2) there's the risk that in the future we'll use a tool other than jira
So I'd prefer you simply say: "Verify that a document's content can be
empty" or if you prefer " Verify that a document's content can be
empty (see XWIKI-2007).". My preference for the former.
BTW naming the test: testEmptyDocumentContentIsAllowed would be even
better :)
Thanks
-Vincent
public void testEmptyContent()
{
open("/xwiki/bin/edit/Test/EmptyWikiContent?editor=wiki");
_______________________________________________
notifications mailing list
notifications(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/notifications