24 Nov
2009
24 Nov
'09
9:17 a.m.
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 8:14 AM, Paul Libbrecht <paul(a)activemath.org> wrote:
Exactly as I feared.
Line numbers are not going to match I'm afraid.
oh what a shame :)
In fact, the problem is not at IntelliJ or Lombok level, it is at Java
level...
I wonder why we still have to code getters/setters by default... as usual
for Sun standards: someone has to do it by itself and when too many people
use it, they are urged to introduce it somewhere as a JSR... and generally
worse than the original...
concerning line numbers, I have already forgot this IDE feature since I use
groovy which also adds lots of things at compilation... our dev IDE are not
prepared for this ;)... lets go back to vi!
paul
Le 24-nov.-09 à 06:32, Asiri Rathnayake a écrit :
As I understood this is not a change to java
syntax or anything.
It's about
augmenting classes when they are compiled. So at source level they
do not
have any getXXX() or setXXX() methods but when compiled lombok does
it's
magic and add the methods. I think most of the IDEs use
compiled .class
files to determine what a class is capable of (rather than analysing
the
source code) but still, there will be a problem if you try to lookup
those
methods in the source file.
Am I correct? Anyone who has tried out lombok?
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs