2 Feb
2014
2 Feb
'14
3:24 p.m.
Hello,
I remember wanting to propose this 2 years ago, but I can't remember why I
didn't do it exactly :)
So, here is my +1
Regards,
Sorin B.
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:06 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
+1. FOP developers don't have the time or desire
to maintain the RTF
output, so it's unlikely to improve. RTF is a limited format.
On the other hand it is the only editable file format that XWiki can
provide standalone. Some users do like the ability to get out a document
they can edit, but I guess it's OK to only expose this feature when an
OO backend is configured.
On 01/30/2014 08:34 AM, vincent(a)massol.net wrote:
Hi,
Our RTF export has never been very good and is even crashing depending
on the
reader you use (see for example
http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-5251 ).
I propose to drop the RTF support without OO
Rationale:
* If a user really needs it he can make it work with an OO server
connected to
xwiki
* RTF is not really a mainstream format
* I don't think we want to invest in fixing our RTF export
Here's my +1
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs