On 26 Nov 2014 at 14:21:48, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
(valicac@gmail.com(mailto:valicac@gmail.com)) wrote:
Hi,
We have discussed this subject multiple times, but we don't have an
official vote and conclusion on the topic.
Problem: In JIRA who is the Assignee of an issue fixed by a Pull Request?
1: Contributor
- he provided the solution
- giving the attributions, the contributor might feel encouraged to
contribute more
- we could do some JIRA statistics on external contributions, but this use
case can be covered by GitHub statistics
2: Committer
- he does the merging on his account and he becomes responsible for the
committed code.
- in case there are problems, the committer needs to find solution, since
we can't rely on contributors availability
- in doing the PR review, the committer spends a lot of time analyzing and
testing the provided solution
We are talking here about complete solutions provided by the PR, since in
case of partial solutions, the committer can assign himself on the issue
(depends on the quantity of modification he does).
Let me know what you think,
It’s not easy to decide. Naturally I’m more tempted by solution 2 (committer) because it’s
usually overall more work from the committer part (review, fix problems and maintain over
the long run) and he’s taking the responsibility for it (in case it leads to problems he’s
one who’s going to have to fix it and take the heat - he can try pushing it back to the
contributor but it may or may not work ;)). Also handling a PR is some work for committers
(we have a lot of open issues with PRs that prove this!) and it’s good that the committer
is “rewarded" by being the assignee in jira too.
Note that the contributor is also already rewarded in the commit history on github and on
our Hall of Fame on
xwiki.org.
Now I’m not going to oppose 1 if everyone believes it’s better. If we do 1 we’ll just need
to put clearly in the Committership page on
xwiki.org the part about the responsibility
when applying PRs.
Thanks
-Vincent
Caty