On 6 Sep 2019, at 10:35, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 10:32 AM Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi Simon,
On 6 Sep 2019, at 10:27, Simon Urli
<simon.urli(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Hi all,
On 05/09/2019 17:40, Simon Urli wrote:
> On 05/09/2019 17:24, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 3:43 PM Simon Urli <simon.urli(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> reopening this thread since I started to close some flicker issues as
>>> part of BFD and got comments for those.
>>>
>>> So the last mails on this threads suggested to close the flicker issues
>>> if we didn't manage to reproduce them locally after a repeated tests,
>>> and that we didn't see them after a while.
>>>
>>> We didn't vote for those suggestion and I assumed a bit quick that I
>>> could close some flicker issues that I personally don't remember about
>>> on the CI after having tested them locally.
>>> My point for doing that is the same as for the first mail I posted on
>>> this thread: those flickers are old, and the code did change enough for
>>> those to be fixed in a way or another.
>>
>> Being old does not always means the code leading to those failures
>> changed that much.
>>
>>>
>>> Now I might be completely wrong, and the flicker to happen again, but I
>>> don't think it's a problem since we can really easily open back the
>>> issues if it's the case.
>>>
>>> The other solution IMO is to indeed keep the issue open and in fact to
>>> never really close them, because we just don't have time to investigate
>>> each of them properly.
>>>
>>> I really don't see any value of keeping things open and don't act on
>>> them, that's why I suggest to close them after doing the checks we
>>> suggested before:
>>> 1. try to repeat locally the failure;
>>
>> This is totally useless IMO unless you make sure that your computer is
>> made super slow some way since that's the reason for most of the
>> flickering tests.
>>
>>> 2. check that we didn't encounter those flickers since last cycle.
>>
>> This one is enough for me but the hard part is to knowing that.
> Ok, so the proposal is now to check only the age since last time we saw them of the
open flickers before closing them.
>>
>>>
>>> So first question, do we all agree on that?
>>>
>>> Then for the second check, Vincent suggested to add some tooling: it
>>> will be best, but it takes time to do. So on the meantime, as Thomas
>>> also suggested, we could add a check in the release plan to create or
>>> update all jira issues that concerns flickers. It would allow us to keep
>>> some information about the liveness of our flickers.
>>>
>>> So second question, do you agree on that?
>>
>> Depends what it exactly means. Have some dedicated jira field to
>> indicate when you saw it last ? Comment that you just saw that test
>> failing again ?
> My suggestion was about a dedicated JIRA field if possible.
So, ok if I create a new custom field in JIRA for flickers, called "Date of last
failure for flicker”?
[snip]
I don’t see how it’ll help since it’ll never be up to date, and the old value will remain
making us think it’s not been flickering for a long time.
In my mind the idea is not so much to use this field as a criteria to
close an issue but as a criteria to not close it.