21 Aug
2014
21 Aug
'14
2:22 p.m.
Hi,
+1 for only testing on Flamingo.
Thanks,
Manuel
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 12:57 PM, Denis Gervalle <dgl(a)softec.lu> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 4:01 PM, vincent(a)massol.net
<vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
On 20 Aug 2014 at 15:55:59, Marius Dumitru Florea (
mariusdumitru.florea@xwiki.com(mailto:mariusdumitru.florea@xwiki.com))
wrote:
We want to have test on all browser with as many skin as possible,
including test of all combination of migrated version, and ... well, what
we want is not really compatible with true reality :)
So, taking into account our team, I do not think we can afford the support
of more than one skin. In practice, I doubt those that see our new skin
will want to stick with colibri for long, and those that will, will also
stick with the old xwiki version they have. The support for both colibri
and flamingo in parallel is also short term, so unless I over estimate the
workload, I am +1 to only support one skin in functional tests, and to also
put some reserves on the usage of colibri in upcoming versions.
Thanks,
I'm fine with running the functional tests
only for the default skin.
Note that although we support many browsers we run the functional
tests only for Firefox.
Which is bad and not something we want ;)
Thanks
-Vincent
3
So I think it's ok if we continue supporting
the Colibri skin for a few versions even if we stop running the
functional tests on it (because it's not the default skin any more).
Thanks,
Marius
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 7:12 PM, vincent(a)massol.net wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> ATM our selenium2-based test fwk for functional tests only supports
one skin
(Colibri).
>
> Guillaume is currently fixing the functional tests by changing our
test
framework to work with Flamingo.
>
> After his changes are made our framework won’t work anymore with
Colibri.
>
> The question is:
> * Is this ok?
> * Do we want to change the framework to support multiple skins? In
this case
we would need to introduce Interfaces everywhere, for each Page
Object to have various implementations.
>
> One example of difference is Hover vs Clicking for the top level
menus.
Another example is that we don’t have anymore a contentmenu; it’s buttons. Etc.
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>
> Any opinion?
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs