Vincent Massol wrote:
On Jul 25, 2008, at 10:15 AM, Anca Paula Luca wrote:
Vincent Massol wrote:
I'd be fine with
http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/ExternalNews/WebHome
but I think it's better to have a top level domain name for several
reasons:
* better visibility
* easier to go to rather than having to go
xwiki.org and click on a
link
* easier for upgrades (XE on
xwiki.org and watch are separate)
this makes me +1
for a separate wiki. I would have had it in the
watch wiki on
xwiki.org but, since the goal is to have the latest version of watch
running
there, we need to make sure it is freely upgradable (which can
require upgrading
the underlying XE).
Otherwise, I still think it should be on
watch.xwiki.org rather than
xwiki.org
for consistency reasons, since it would be a demo of watch -- that
is the main
purpose as I see it, allowing people to click around and have a
quick look
without having to download, install, etc.
Then we still have a disagreement :)
Right now (and I'd like to keep it this way) all wikis on the
xwiki.org domain are for *real*. They are not test platforms for
people to see how xwiki works and have some fun trying it. They have
real usages (documentation of the xwiki software).
We have one exception: this is
playground.xwiki.org which is there for
people to test and play around.
Thus my proposal is:
1) have a new wiki (
news.xwiki.org, same as we have
jira.xwiki.org,
svn.xwiki.org and
maven.xwiki.org) which will be our news "portal".
Note: It will also listen to the
xwiki.org Blog feed.
2) have a Watch space in
playground.xwiki.org for people to try out
Watch.
it makes a lot of sense, so:
+0 for 1: it would be nice to have it, it would be nice to have it working
properly (having people *really* collaboratively watching) but that is not the
purpose I started this thread for.
+1 for 2, since this one is :). But now we're back one mail to the upgrade
problem: I would like to have always the last version of watch running in the
playground, which could require platform / XE upgrades, from time to time, since
the plugins & modules that watch is using don't really have their own lifecycle,
yet.
And one more thing, I'm not very up to date with how it works, but isn't the
playground cleaned daily?
Happy coding,
Anca
But I'm -1 to have a watch playground on
watch.xwiki.org since I don't
want to blur the lines and I want to make it very clear that demo/
testing is on
playground.xwiki.org and the rest is for real.
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
> Yes we'll need that (in the right panel
not left ;)).
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs