mflorea (SVN) wrote:
Author: mflorea
Date: 2008-09-26 12:48:14 +0200 (Fri, 26 Sep 2008)
New Revision: 13009
Modified:
platform/web/trunk/standard/src/main/webapp/templates/editwysiwygnew.vm
Log:
The teletype feature will be included in 1.7 so I removed it from the tool bar. I also
changed the way the editor loads. Now it gets as input HTML and not wiki syntax. This way
the editor loads faster.
The textarea held wiki markup, so that in case JS is disabled, the user
can still edit the content. Is it OK to break this? Will such a user
know to open the wiki editor instead? Should there be 2 textareas, one
with the wiki markup, and a hidden one with the HTML content?
Modified:
platform/web/trunk/standard/src/main/webapp/templates/editwysiwygnew.vm
===================================================================
--- platform/web/trunk/standard/src/main/webapp/templates/editwysiwygnew.vm 2008-09-26
10:45:11 UTC (rev 13008)
+++ platform/web/trunk/standard/src/main/webapp/templates/editwysiwygnew.vm 2008-09-26
10:48:14 UTC (rev 13009)
@@ -26,14 +26,14 @@
<link rel="stylesheet"
href="${request.contextPath}/com.xpn.xwiki.wysiwyg.Wysiwyg/Wysiwyg.css" />
<script type="text/javascript"
src="${request.contextPath}/com.xpn.xwiki.wysiwyg.Wysiwyg/com.xpn.xwiki.wysiwyg.Wysiwyg.nocache.js"></script>
<iframe src="javascript:''" id="__gwt_historyFrame"
style="width:0;height:0;border:0"></iframe>
-$xwiki.getTextArea($tdoc.content)
+$xwiki.getTextArea($xwiki.wysiwyg.toHTML($tdoc.content, $doc.syntaxId))
<script type="text/javascript">
//<![CDATA[
var Wysiwyg0 = {
hookId: 'content',
syntax: "$doc.syntaxId",
plugins: 'separator text valign list indent undo format symbol',
- toolbar: 'bold italic underline strikethrough teletype | subscript superscript
| unorderedlist orderedlist | outdent indent | undo redo | format | hr symbol',
+ toolbar: 'bold italic underline strikethrough | subscript superscript |
unorderedlist orderedlist | outdent indent | undo redo | format | hr symbol',
debug: #if($request.debug)'true'#else'false'#end
};
//]]>