the technical issues. Maybe the devs can find some solution to
extend the
color themes to support this.
Otherwise VarC is also a good step forward.
In any case it's great work. The earlier it gets in the product the better.
We need this.
Ludovic
2011/12/16 Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <valicac(a)gmail.com>
Hi,
Ludovic suggested we should refresh the Default Color Theme for XE 3.4 with
something new. Since (and long before) we dropped support for IE6 and IE7
(XE 3.2) I wanted to add some CSS3 enhancement to our default skin:
shadows, gradients, round corners, etc. So this is a good time to make a
proposal that integrates some CSS3 (gradients on menus, panels, tabs,
buttons, forms; text-shadows; box-shadows; border-radius;) and a new
ColorTheme into Colibri skin:
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/34Proposal
There are 3 directions that can be voted for this proposal:
*Var A:* Integrate the proposed Skin improvements and the new ColorTheme
into platform
Demo at
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/WebHome
*Var B: *Don't integrate anything in the 3.4 timeframe and wait for a new
complete skin in 4.x = Current skin + default ColorTheme (no changes)
Demo at
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Drafts/WebHome
*Var C:* Integrate just the new proposed ColorTheme that will replace the
current DefaultColorTheme
Demo at
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Standards/WebHome
*Important remarks when making a decision:*
*Var B* and *Var C *does not involve any changes, problems or advantages
from the current Colibri skin.
Advantages for *Var A*:
- Tested on IE7, IE8, IE9, Opera 11, Chrome 16, Firefox 8, Safari 5 and
works beautifully.
- Uses CSS3 declarations that makes the skin more nice (gradients, round
corners, shades, etc.)
Problems for *Var A*:
- The existing ColorThemes (from the ColorThemes space and
extensions.xwiki.org) will become deprecated for XE 3.4 since the new skin
needs shades for the gradients (this means the existing ColorThemes
variables will be either used in ways they were not intended or they will
not have all the variables declared). See my previous mail about
"[Discussion]
Problematic ColorTheme
extensibility"<http://xwiki.markmail.org/thread/ex6fgou6fl6vjwfr>
- The CSS will become even more invalid (right now we have a
-moz-border-radius and a word-wrap non valid declarations), but the new
code contains 154 declarations for the gradients (covering
-moz-linear-gradient, -webkit-gradient, -webkit-linear-gradient,
-o-linear-gradient, -ms-linear-gradient, linear-gradient and filter:
progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.gradient proprietary declarations). The
invalidity comes because the proprietary declarations are not yet W3C
standard (and will not ever be a standard). The proposed standard W3C
declaration (linear-gradient) is not yet supported consistently and
correctly by browsers, but when it will become standard we can remove all
the other proprietary declarations.
Please cast your vote.
Thanks,
Caty
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs