+1
Thanks,
Eduard
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 10:17 AM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
+1
If the extensions have a different license header than the one used by
XWiki, than after the 'donation' the license headers will be replaced.
Question: beside the blame, should we have a standard way to mention
contributors on that extensions? or initial sponsors?
Thanks,
caty
On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 9:51 AM, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com
wrote:
> +1
> On Tue, Jul 8, 2014 at 1:28 AM, Denis
Gervalle <dgl(a)softec.lu> wrote:
> > +1
>
>
> > On Mon, Jul 7, 2014 at 7:24 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu
<sergiu(a)xwiki.org>
> wrote:
>
> >> +1.
> >>
> >> On 07/07/2014 12:39 PM, vincent(a)massol.net wrote:
> >>
> >> > Hi devs,
> >>
> >> > Following
the proposal thread at
> >>
http://markmail.org/message/ppw2slpgqou2ihai I’d like to move on and
> I’ve
> >> prepared below a full proposal that I’d like us to VOTE on.
> >>
> >> >
Rationale/Need
> >> > ===============
> >>
> >> > The
needs:
> >> > * Be able to extract some apps from xwiki-contrib that the XWiki Dev
> >> Team would like to maintain. Example: File Manager app developed by
> Marius
> >> when it’ll have had some releases and tests (if it doesn’t have some
> >> already!), GitHub Stats app used on
xwiki.org, Meeting Manager App,
> Forum
> >> App, etc
> >> > * Be able to extract some extensions currently located in
> xwiki-platform
> >> but not released with XE so that they can have a different release
cycle
>> (examples: FAQ app, IRCBot extension,
JIRA macro, etc). Having
different
> >> release cycle allow to release new versions quicker to our users (bug
> >> fixes, new features).
> >>
> >> >
Governance
> >> > ==========
> >>
> >> > Details:
> >>
> >> > *
Extensions are VOTEd in on a case by case basis.
> >>
> >> > * Each
voted extensions will have its own Git Repository in the
> “xwiki”
> >> organization (so that each extension can be released independently of
> each
> >> other).
> >>
> >> > * When
moving an extension either from xwiki-contrib or from
> >> xwiki-platform, keep its Git history as much as possible or simply
> donate
> >> the repo to the “xwiki" organization.
> >>
> >> > * FTM
extensions bundled by default with XE would still remain in
> XWiki
> >> Commons/Rendering/Platform/Enterprise.
> >>
> >> > * The Git
repository name should be of the form xwiki-<short project
> >> name>. <short project name> should be part of the VOTE.
> >>
> >> > * All
rules from
http://dev.xwiki.org apply
> >>
> >> > * Each
extension has a Release Manager defined and he’s responsible
> for
> >> defining its own Roadmap/Release notes (if need be), on the extension
> page
> >> on e.x.o and perform the releases or ensure the extension is released
> >> regularly when there are changes.
> >>
> >> > * Each
extension must follow these criteria for being VOTEd:
> >> > ** A Release Manager needs to be defined in the proposal
> >> > ** The extension must have had several releases already (i.e.
someone
>> wanting to propose a new extensions that
doesn’t exist would start in
>> xwiki-contrib for ex and prove that his extension works and is useful
by
>> doing several releases and creating the
pages on e.x.o)
>> > ** It must follow our best practices defined on
http://dev.xwiki.org
> >> (coding practices, tests, etc) and follow the apps best practices (for
> >> apps), see
> >>
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/ApplicationDevelopmentBestPra…
>> > ** It must have one or several
integration or functional tests (for
>> apps) to prove that it works. This allows to prove the app continues
>> working when XWiki progresses
>> > ** The main contributors of the extensions must agree about the
move.
> If
> >> they have the “level" to be an xwiki dev committer then they should
be
> >> voted in (see
>
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/Committership).
> >> If not then either they’re ok to send Pull Requests or the extension
> should
> >> not be moved.
> >>
> >> > * If an
extension ceases to work or if its quality becomes too low,
it
> >> can be moved to xwiki-contrib with a VOTE
> >>
> >> > * We
would create one JIRA project per extension
> >>
> >> > * We
would create a new JIRA Category called “XWiki Extensions”
> >>
> >> > * We
would put the extensions in our CI at
http://ci.xwiki.org
> >>
> >> > * The
Java package should follow the same rule as for XWiki
Platform,
> >> i.e. org.xwiki.<short project name>. Exceptions would need to be
> discussed.
> >>
> >> > * The
group id for extensions having their own repo should be
> >> org.xwiki.<short project name>. The <short project name> needs
to be
> part
> >> of the VOTE when proposing a new extensions.
> >>
> >> > Here’s my
+1
> >>
> >> > Thanks
> >> > -Vincent
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Sergiu Dumitriu
> >>
http://purl.org/net/sergiu
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> devs mailing list
> >> devs(a)xwiki.org
> >>
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> >>
>
>
>
> > --
> > Denis Gervalle
> > SOFTEC sa - CEO
> > _______________________________________________
> > devs mailing list
> > devs(a)xwiki.org
> >
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> --
> Thomas Mortagne
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> devs(a)xwiki.org
>
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs