On Mar 9, 2007, at 3:52 PM, jeremi joslin wrote:
Hi,
I'm not for letting selenium by default on the wiki. I would prefer to
setup a config parameter to add it.
is it possible to activate selenium just by adding to the url ?
selenium=1 ?
like this it easy to activate fo the current page, and normal user
don't have to load it.
I don't understand what you mean Jeremi. If Selenium XAR is not
included in the default wiki then it cannot be activated as it won't
be there. Of course any user can at any time include it in his wiki
(this is already available).
-Vincent
On 3/9/07, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
Hi,
I committed in SVN the automatic inclusion of our Functional Test
suite in the default wiki. Sergiu rightly pointed that we need to
discuss this before including it as it's not completely end user
focused.
Here are the reasons I thought it would be good to be included:
1) It's related to end users if we say that this is a feature to
verify that XWiki is correctly installed. They can delete it after if
they want. I strongly believe tests should extend to users in some
manner, especially for an open source project.
2) This would allow users to help us discover problems in a more
controlled manner. Indeed if users have this app installed, once they
encounter a problem they could record a test suite proving the
problem and give it to us. This would 1) increase our test suite and
2) allow us to reproduce the pb, fix it and verify the fix passes the
test. In some way this is about transforming a portion of our users
into contributors :)
Now Sergiu says that this is increasing the size of the default Wiki.
Yes this is true. It goes from 320KB to 542KB. Is it worth it?
To be honest, I don't know if this will work or not but I was curious
to try it out and see what we can come up with.
My idea here is really to try lowering the bar for writing functional
tests for everyone and for us to get better at controlling if XWiki
works or not.
We could have another wiki (say "wikidebug" or "wikitest") which is
the default wiki + the Selenium app and let people interested use it.
But it won't be as effective I think. I find it kind of cool to have
our installation verification tool inside the delivered default wiki.
Another idea: we could have a button in Selenium.WebHome to
completely remove the space if the user doesn't want it for example.
Anyway I'm curious to know what everyone thinks about this. I agree
with Sergiu that it's not 100% required. At the same I'm curious with
the experiment.
Thanks
-Vincent
PS: If we decide we don't want it I'll remove it from the build so
that it isn't included in the default wiki by default and I'll mark
XWIKI-959 as won't fix.
--
You receive this message as a subscriber of the xwiki-
dev(a)objectweb.org mailing list.
To unsubscribe: mailto:xwiki-dev-unsubscribe@objectweb.org
For general help: mailto:sympa@objectweb.org?subject=help
ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://
www.objectweb.org/wws
--
Jeremi Joslin (
http://www.jeremi.info)
skype: jeremi23 - jabber: jeremi23(a)gmail.com
http://www.xwiki.com -
http://www.pengyou-project.info
--
You receive this message as a subscriber of the xwiki-
dev(a)objectweb.org mailing list.
To unsubscribe: mailto:xwiki-dev-unsubscribe@objectweb.org
For general help: mailto:sympa@objectweb.org?subject=help
ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page:
http://www.objectweb.org/
wws