24 Apr
2009
24 Apr
'09
1:12 p.m.
Jerome Velociter wrote:
Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
It uses a Set interface, which internally is a LinkedHashSet. From the
javadoc:
"This linked list defines the iteration ordering, which is the order in
which elements were inserted into the set (insertion-order). Note that
insertion order is not affected if an element is re-inserted into the set."
So the order is right.
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/
Jerome Velociter wrote:
Also, with jsfx is the order in which the resulting script tags are
written down deterministic ? Is it First In First Out ? If not then it's
probably too dangerous. We should decide on which way we want to include
our JS/CSS in
templates. I'd say only with (js|ss)fx plugin is ok.
I don't know, this will create a stronger dependency on the plugin. Are
we 100% sure we want that?
I guess that if a sysadmin decides to remove the js plugins, then he can
also replace these calls with <script> tags, too, so I don't think that
this is a severe problem. using jsfx seems better to me, too.