27 Aug
2009
27 Aug
'09
10:32 a.m.
Just re-read my message and I realized I didn't express myself
correctly so apologies for this.
I definitely didn't mean that the color theme app was crap. I love it
actually. I was talking generally speaking and answering Guillaume
about not doing things that are technically not correct just because
it would benefit some (0.1%) of users.
Sorry for the tone and confusion, especially since I'm thrilled by the
new skin and the color themes :)
Thanks
-Vincent
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 10:17 AM, Vincent Massol<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
On Aug 26, 2009, at 9:50 AM, Guillaume Lerouge wrote:
Agreed. Can we add the ColorThemes space to the list of blacklsted spaces
easily?
Guillaume
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
>>> WDYT?
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -Vincent
>>>
>>> On Aug 26, 2009, at 9:21 AM, sdumitriu (SVN) wrote:
>>>
>>>> Author: sdumitriu
>>>> Date: 2009-08-26 09:21:10 +0200 (Wed, 26 Aug 2009)
>>>> New Revision: 22926
>>>>
>>>> Added:
>>>> enterprise/trunk/wiki/src/main/resources/ColorThemes/
>>>> enterprise/trunk/wiki/src/main/resources/ColorThemes/BlueSky.xml
>>>> enterprise/trunk/wiki/src/main/resources/ColorThemes/Bordo.xml
>>>> enterprise/trunk/wiki/src/main/resources/ColorThemes/
>>>> ColorThemeClass.xml
>>>> enterprise/trunk/wiki/src/main/resources/ColorThemes/
>>>> ColorThemeSheet.xml
>>>> enterprise/trunk/wiki/src/main/resources/ColorThemes/
>>>> ColorThemeTemplate.xml
>>>> enterprise/trunk/wiki/src/main/resources/ColorThemes/
>>>> DefaultColorTheme.xml
>>>> enterprise/trunk/wiki/src/main/resources/ColorThemes/InnerDark.xml
>>>> enterprise/trunk/wiki/src/main/resources/ColorThemes/Nature.xml
>>>> enterprise/trunk/wiki/src/main/resources/ColorThemes/Nightfall.xml
>>>> enterprise/trunk/wiki/src/main/resources/ColorThemes/Peach.xml
>>>> enterprise/trunk/wiki/src/main/resources/ColorThemes/WebHome.xml
>>>> Log:
>>>> XE-?: New ColorTheme application
>>>> Done
Hi,
On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 9:34 AM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
This isn't a good reason Guillaume. We cannot do technical crap just to
satisfy the user's curiosity. For example are you suggesting we put all the
java code we have as groovy code inside wiki pages so that people who want
to see the code can do so easily?
The same applies for vms which could all be put as skins in wiki pages.
Letting users creating new color themes as wiki pages is one thing. Deciding
that our skins are now packaged as both a zip and a XAR is another.
Thanks
-Vincent
On Aug 26, 2009, at 9:31 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
In the case of ColorThemes it's easy for users to create new ones so it
makes sense to have all of them available as examples inside the wiki. Vincent Massol wrote:
>
> Hi everyone,
>
> hmm we need to decide where to put this. I think it's the first time
> we have pages for a skin.
>
> Is that something we want? Till now we've used vms instead of pages
> for skins.
> Or do you consider color themes independent of a
given skin? In which
> case, we could decide to create an application for it in
> applications/
In the future this will be moved to a skin application, once we
refactor
the way skins work (new Skins.SkinClass and the logic behind it).
Right now, it's not hard-tied to the skin, so it makes sense as
documents inside XE.
Another pb is that ColorThemes isn't put in the blacklisted spaces I
think so this space will appear by default everywhere we list spaces
(dashboard, etc)
I don't think this is something simple users should see, right?