Jonas von Malottki wrote:
Hi Sergiu,
sorry to bother, but I noticed that the Interface-file changed. Thus the
patch will not apply cleanly. Are you going to apply this patch?
Since nobody really objected the MessageFormat I guess it is accepted?
If it helps I can resubmit a patch using MessageFormat!/?
If you can resubmit a patch, that would be perfect, it would save me
some time thus it will be quickly applied.
Thank you.
Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
> Hi devs,
>
> I'd like to apply
http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-2667 , but one
> thing I'd like to change is the format of the log messages. The current
> patch uses String.format, but I prefer MessageFormat, as it is more
> expressive, and it is already used by the localization tool.
>
> So:
> 1. We use String.format, because:
> - it is "simpler" (some say)
> - it is familiar to C/C++ programmers
> - it is a bit more customizable at the finer level
> - the code is already written
>
> 2. We use MessageFormat, because:
> - it is already used for localization strings
> - it is more expressive (I really like the "choice" format)
> - it is apparently less customizable, but it uses good defaults (I'd
> rather specify that I want a "long" date format than a "DD MMMM
HH:mm:ss
> z" format)
> - the changes are minimal
> - I for one prefer this syntax, rather than the old printf one.
>
> My +1 for option 2.
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/