1) who
"owns" it and thus "controls" (or rather provides direction
for) its content
2) can it be used for business advertising (support, paid packages,
consulting services)
Bit of History about XWiki SAS
========================
- XWiki SAS (
http://xwiki.com) is the company founded by Ludovic
Dubost the creator of XWiki (I'm the CTO of XWiki SAS in addition to
being a committer here).
- Most of the active contributors are also employed and paid by XWiki
SAS to develop the XWiki software. Today that's
-- 12.5 committers (developers)
-- 1 open source product manager (see
http://markmail.org/thread/ggaaw4u6yyci4oan
for its definition)
-- 1 designer
-- 1 tester/technical writer
- XWiki SAS sells services around the open source software, see
http://www.xwiki.com/xwiki/bin/view/Services/
- XWiki SAS truly believes and understands open source, see
http://www.xwiki.com/xwiki/bin/view/About/Values
-- I also wrote a blog post on this some time back:
http://massol.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Blog/XWikiSASAndOpenSource
- XWiki SAS has promised "not to do evil" ;), see its manifesto at
http://www.xwiki.com/xwiki/bin/view/About/Manifesto
- XWiki SAS is paying for the servers and maintenance of
xwiki.org,
myxwiki.org, the maven repo, the svn repo, the hudson build serversn
the free JUG farm, and more
Issue at hand
===========
XWiki SAS would like to generate more revenue to be able to increase
the development pace of the XWiki software. We'd like to fund even
more the development of XWiki, so that it becomes an even better
product. We've asked you what you'd like to see in the future in XWiki
and you've answered on this survey result:
http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Blog/Features+Survey+Results
We'd like to implement those features as fast as possible.
For this we need to ensure that users interested in commercial
services find easily the way to
http://xwiki.com, even when they
arrive on
xwiki.org.
This is true for XWiki SAS's services but also for any company willing
to offer services around the XWiki open source project. There's no
magic. Developers need to be paid when they work full time on some
project. We need a commercial ecosystem around XWiki for it to
progress as quickly as its competitors (the collaboration market). We
need to allow for commercial companies the ability to generate revenue
from their work on the XWiki open source project. However we also want
to continue ensuring that all the XWiki development is done in open
source, under a LGPL license.
Governance Proposal
=================
1)
xwiki.org is controlled by the XWiki committers. This means that
important changes brought to it should be discussed/vote on the list,
using the same practices as for code commits
2)
xwiki.org stays open in edit mode to all external contributors (and
XWiki committers continue to monitor it to remove spam, etc)
3) we agree to start with 3 zones where companies can advertise their
commercial offers on top of the XWiki open source product:
-- On the download page (for business packages, subscriptions, hosting)
-- On the support page (for services: support, consulting)
-- (still to be defined) Possibly on a "Products" tab in the new
horizontal navigation. The idea would be to do as
jboss.org is doing.
Projects are open source and community and Products are commercial
4) the company offerings are listed by their amount of contributions
to the XWiki open source project. The company that contributes most
(XWiki SAS today) gets the best spots (top of the list, bigger space)
5) Companies who want to be listed should provide some proof of their
contributions to the XWiki open source project
6) XWiki SAS gets some acknowledgment for paying for the
xwiki.org
server/maintenance of it. Probably somewhere in the footer of the site
or on side panel somewhere
7)
xwiki.org should always remain a site for the xwiki open source
community
Conclusion
=========
We want to stress that this proposal is not about XWiki SAS making a
commercial takeover of the
xwiki.org site.
It's about recognizing that if the XWiki open source software
progresses quickly today, it's thanks to contributors but also for a
very large proportion to companies paying developers to work on it,
either directly (like XWiki SAS or other companies that have
developers contributing) or indirectly (by paying for example XWiki
SAS or other companies to work on specific features).
It's also about recognizing that XWiki SAS is happy to see other
companies willing to contribute to the progress of the XWiki open
source project and thus to provide a place for these companies to be
visible too.
I hope that all our contributors but also users of the XWiki Open
Source software will find this proposal acceptable and I welcome any
feedback on it.
Sounds good to me.
Note: I work for XWiki SAS too. I'd love to get feedback from people
outside
the company - Denis, Caleb, Pascal, Christophe, Jérémie, Ricardo and all
the
others: it's time to join the discussion! ;-)
Guillaume
Thanks
-Vincent Massol
Hat 1: XWiki SAS CTO
Hat 2: XWiki committer
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Guillaume Lerouge
Product Manager - XWiki SAS
Skype: wikibc
Twitter: glerouge
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org