On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi devs,
I’m transforming the brainstorming that was started in the thread
http://markmail.org/message/exlndbq3tw2thmmu into a VOTE mail since this
is a very important decision.
So I’m asking you to vote for defining a new direction for the XWiki Core
Dev Team (i.e. for the XWiki GitHub Organization). The need was triggered
by the Tour and CKEditor extensions which are currently in xwiki-contrib
and that we want our users to have by default. For more details see this
thread:
http://markmail.org/message/exlndbq3tw2thmmu
So here’s the strategy:
* Make XWiki Github org == minimal runtime, where minimal means “basic
wiki” (page edition, history, linking, wiki markup, etc). The notion of
“basic wiki” would need to be better defined but this can be done later on.
* Provide a "Base Flavor" which corresponds to this “basic wiki”, as part
of xwiki-platform (this would be xwiki-platform-distribution).
* Provide another flavor, the "Default Flavor” which would add some
hand-picked third-party extensions (i.e. from contrib) such as the Tour app
and CKEditor (to start with, we could also add the markdown syntax for
example which is one of the most asked syntaxes). Note that this Default
Flavor would actually be a “replacement" of xwiki-enterprise.
* The Default Flavor would have at least the same release cycle as the
base flavor but it could have more releases (if some of the bundled
third-party extensions has some important bug fixes or new features that we
want to offer quickly without waiting for the next base flavor release).
* The consequence is that the XWiki Dev Team would need to be a bit more
careful to monitor the quality of bundled third-party extensions in contrib
(check commits, do some smoke testing, etc). Note that the goal of the
Default flavor would not be to offer verticals (for this there should be
some contrib flavors) and thus it wouldn’t bundle a lot of third-party
extensions. Basically we’ll need to validate the version of those
third-party extensions that include in the flavor.
My POV is that globally this would offer more flexibility for our users
(they’ll be able to install extensions such as CK and Tour in older XWiki
versions and they’ll get more frequent releases) at the cost of some
overhead to develop extensions that work in several versions. The dev team
is pretty small and thus it means developing a bit less fast but it’s
probably as important, if not more important, to make the code we develop
available in older xwiki versions, as XWiki gains traction.
IMO, the overhead will depends on the needs, but what will be a net
benefice is not to artificially raise extensions requirements when there is
no change, or when the change does not implies the need for a recent API.
+1, of course :)
Here’s my +1
Please cast your vote.
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Denis Gervalle
SOFTEC sa - CEO