There seem to be some resources on the topic:
https://github.com/libgdx/libgdx/wiki/Bundling-a-JRE
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/7071133/how-to-bundle-a-jre-with-launch…
https://codeiseasy.wordpress.com/2012/07/31/including-a-jre-in-a-tycho-buil…
...so it's not such an uncommon practice.
On the legal side, OpenJDK should be the obvious choice:
https://opensource.stackexchange.com/questions/4824/is-it-legal-to-bundle-o…
IMO, it would make sense to provide the full and ready to test package,
rather than an only 90% ready to test one.
Thanks,
Eduard
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 12:04 PM, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com
wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:49 AM, Eduard Moraru <enygma2002(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
> > AFAIR, Eclipse also does this
(i.e. bundle their own JRE), we could look
> > into how they do it.
>
> Eclipse JDT comes with its own Java compiler but you are supposed to
> install Java to run Eclipse itself.
>
> >
> > On a quick check, OpenJDK's JRE is only 38.4 MB (
> >
http://jdk.java.net/java-se-ri/8) ... I find that acceptable.
>
> Not sure the license allow us to embbed what's on that page.
>
> 38.4MB is probably only for one system, I think you need 3 of those
> (Linux, Windows, Mac)
>
> >
> > FTR, the JDK is 164 MB.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Eduard
> >
> > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 11:40 AM, Thomas Mortagne <
> thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com
> >
wrote:
> >
> >> One issue with embedded Java (OpenJDK I guess) is that it would make
> >> the zip quite huge.
> >>
> >> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:30 AM, Eduard Moraru
<enygma2002(a)gmail.com>
> >
wrote:
> >>
> Hi,
> >> >
> >> > On the palliative side (i.e. not actually fixing, but at least making
> >> life
> >> > a bit easier), we might consider a naming scheme for the downloadable
> >> that
> >> > includes that supported java version, e.g. xwiki-10.3-java8.zip
> (though
> >> > this might also lead users to thinking that the java 8 runtime is
> >> > included... which might not be that bad of an idea, if we think about
> >> it...
> >> > at least for the zip version that is for demo purposes, which already
> >> > contains the web server, the database, but still expects the user to
> >> > understand and install the correct Java runtime, which makes no
> sense.)
> >> >
> >> > So, yeah... TL;DR: add the java8 runtime to the .zip package and make
> >> life
> >> > easier for everyone. Optionally (though not sure if needed anymore,
> if we
> >> > bundle it), include it in the .zip file name.
> >> >
> >> > Of course, the production install, if done manually (i.e. not through
> >> > .deb/.rpm packages), expects that the user reads the documentation.
> >> >
> >> > Thanks,
> >> > Eduard
> >> >
> >> > On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 10:19 AM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net>
> >
wrote:
> >>
>
> >> >> Hi devs, here’s a feedback we received, FYI.
> >> >>
> >> >> Ideas?
> >> >>
> >> >> Thanks
> >> >> -Vincent
> >> >>
> >> >> > Begin forwarded message:
> >> >> >
> >> >> > From: Vincent Massol
> >> >> > Subject: Re: Get started with XWiki
> >> >> > Date: 14 May 2018 at 09:10:06 CEST
> >> >> > To: XXX
> >> >> > Cc: XXX
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Hi Christian,
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> On 12 May 2018, at 14:25, Christian XXX wrote:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> It's not working.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> And as usual ith java, the log does not help. Maybe if I
were an
> >> >> expert? But an app is supposed to be installed by just
'smart' users,
> >> not
> >> >> experts.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > If you choose the easy installation methods we propose then
it’s
> easy
> >> >> and you have nothing to do.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Which distribution did you choose and use?
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> And there is no help from the website.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Oracle Linux 7.
> >> >> >> Linux localhost.localdomain 4.1.12-124.14.5.el7uek.x86_64
#2 SMP
> Fri
> >> >> May 4 15:26:53 PDT 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> >> >> >> Java 10
> >> >> >> Xwiki 10.3
> >> >> >> tomcat.
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> If it is not compatible whith this java. It should not
install.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > It’s just not been tested with Java 10 yet. It’s not even
fully
> >> working
> >> >> with Java 9.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Note that it’s hard to check for the java version for all the
> >> >> distributions since XWiki is a webapp and the XWiki WAR can just
be
> >> dropped
> >> >> in a servlet container and thus we don’t have a startup script and
a
> >> place
> >> >> where we can put a check. All we could do is have a Servlet
Listener
> >> that
> >> >> would emit a big stack trace (like the one you got) and that would
> say
> >> at
> >> >> the innermost level that XWiki requires Java <= 8. But even
that
> >> wouldn’t
> >> >> be good since it would prevent testing in Java 9+. We want
feedback
> from
> >> >> users about what works/what doesn’t work so improve support for
Java
> 9
> >> and
> >> >> 10.
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> If it is compatible with only one version of java, which
one?
> >> >> >
> >> >> > You need to read the installation page ;)
> >> >> >
> >> >> > See
http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Documentation/
> >> >> AdminGuide/Installation/ and especially:
> >> >> >
http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Documentation/
> >> >> AdminGuide/Installation/#HHardwareandSoftwarerequirements
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Here is the error:
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >>
> >> >> >> Error number 4001 in 4: Error while evaluating velocity
template
> >> >> colorThemeInit.vm
> >> >> >> Error number 4001 in 4: Error while evaluating velocity
template
> >> >> colorThemeInit.vm
> >> >> >> com.xpn.xwiki.XWikiException: Error number 4001 in 4:
Error while
> >> >> evaluating velocity template colorThemeInit.vm
> >> >> >
> >> >> > [snip]
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: No standard
field
> found
> >> >> for reverse order comparator!
> >> >> >> at
org.jboss.marshalling.river.Protocol.<clinit>(Protocol.
> >> >> java:276)
> >> >> >> ... 249 mor
> >> >> >
> >> >> > [snip
> >> >> >
> >> >> >> Caused by: java.lang.IllegalStateException: No standard
field
> found
> >> >> for reverse order comparator!
> >> >> >> at
org.jboss.marshalling.river.Protocol.<clinit>(Protocol.
> >> >> java:276)
> >> >> >> ... 249 mor
> >> >> >
> >> >> > What this says is that JBoss Infinispan (which we use) is not
> >> compatible
> >> >> with Java 10. Apparently this is fixed in recent version of JBoss
> >> >> Marshalling:
https://issues.jboss.org/browse/JBMAR-216. We
probably
> >> just
> >> >> need to wait for JBoss Infinispan to release a new version that
uses
> >> JBoss
> >> >> Marshalling 2.1.0.Final.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > What would be awesome would be for you to report the problem
of
> using
> >> >> XWiki with Java 10 on
https://jira.xwiki.org so that we can have
an
> >> issue
> >> >> for it and work to make it work.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Note that I’m replying to this message to help you out but
it’s not
> >> the
> >> >> right place to post a question and get help normally. For that we
> have a
> >> >> user forum at
https://forum.xwiki.org/.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > I’m sorry you had some issues. OTOH you’re looking for trouble
by
> >> trying
> >> >> with Java 10. There are very few (if any!) java app that currently
> work
> >> >> with Java 9 and 10. You’d be much better off using Java 8. On the
> >> positive
> >> >> side, if you raise the issue on
https://jira.xwiki.org, then you
> will
> >> >> transform your negative experience into a positive one, by
> contributing
> >> to
> >> >> the development of XWiki and helping out future users.
> >> >> >
> >> >> > Thanks
> >> >> > -Vincent Massol
> >> >>
> >> >> [snip]
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> Thomas Mortagne
> >>
>
>
>
> --
> Thomas Mortagne
>