All propositions are nice. However, this is my point of view.
# Variant 2.1:
Enumeration probably isn't a good option; it works when you have 2 languages, it
begins to cause problems when you have 20 (visual annoyance, possible problem of
UI alignement)
but visual of 2.1.1 is nice :-)
# Variant 2.2:
This is my preferred view. I'm not sure which one of the subvariant is the best
but I would eliminate the first one for the same reason as 2.3 (see below).
However, the user will click in order to load another page/content, then a link
like 2.2.2 would be better?
# Variant 2.3:
I'm against adding another big button in the UI. The strength of Flamingo is
for me that it is far more visually light that Colibri.
# Variant 2.4:
This seems to be a good solution, as well as 2.2. Just personal, I would go for
the 2.2 instead of 2.4 because language is part of the content and should be
displayed without clicking on a button.
This is only my point of view.
Hope this helps.
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 06:34:26PM +0300, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) wrote:
Hi devs,
We have
http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-10745 (Improve the display of
available languages in Flamingo) which is related to
http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-6402 (Separate Interface language and
page language settings)
While in Flamingo we could just make the language links look better,
without changing the functionality, for the future, the separation is
something we might want to tackle, that's why I've created this proposal
page
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/InterfaceAndContentLanguage…
I am interested in what you think about the variants.
Thanks,
Caty
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Jean SIMARD <jean.simard(a)xwiki.com>