18 Nov
2013
18 Nov
'13
8:22 p.m.
Yes it's ok now, thanks ! :)
Le 18 nov. 2013 15:23, "Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)" <valicac(a)gmail.com> a
écrit :
I think now it's fixed: the {{code}} and edit
right problems.
Thanks Jeremie for reporting,
Caty
On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 3:08 PM, Jeremie BOUSQUET <
jeremie.bousquet(a)gmail.com> wrote:
other
> have
> >>> >>> been
> >>> >>> > > imported with history, but when you look at them
you see they
some
is
states
be
'Completed',
be
archive I
visual
developer-centric
> >>> view :)
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> > > 'Feature' is used for 'parent'
categories and for proposals
> that
> >>> don't
> >>> >>> > > belong to any other category (you could create a
special page
(Valica)
> >>> >>> > > > > > <valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >>> > > > > > > Hi,
> >>> >>> > > > > > >
> >>> >>> > > > > > > *Short version* for voting:
> >>> >>> > > > > > > *A*. Creation of a new wiki
on xwiki.org farm that
> will
> >>> hold
> >>> >>> > > > > development
> >>> >>> > > > > > > process details about a
specific feature. This wiki
> will
> >>> >>> > deprecate
> >>> >>> > > > > > > dev.xwiki.org:Design and
incubator.myxwiki.org
> >>> >>> > > > > >
> >>> >>> > > > > > +1
> >>> >>> > > > > >
> >>> >>> > > > > > >
> >>> >>> > > > > > > *B*. Vote on naming
alternatives for this new wiki:
> >>> >>> > > > > > > design.xwiki.org
> >>> >>> > > > > > > incubator.xwiki.org
> >>> >>> > > > > >
> >>> >>> > > > > > +1 for design.xwiki.org
> >>> >>> > > > > > -0 for incubator.xwiki.org,
"incubator" means
> >>> implementations
> >>> >>> > > waiting
> >>> >>> > > > > > to be approved in some mainstream
repository for me not
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/XWikiOrgDesignWiki
located
not
is
http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/XWikiOrgDesignWiki
by
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
It's **almost** ok, now I can view the page
when logged in, but I still
don't have edit rights ... ;)
2013/11/18 Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>
> Ok this time it's really ok...
>
> There was not existing groups with rights set to them on that wiki.
>
> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:30 AM, Thomas Mortagne
> <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
> > I had forgotten one, should be ok now.
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 11:18 AM, Jeremie BOUSQUET
> > <jeremie.bousquet(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Same issue here ...
> >>
> >>
> >> 2013/11/18 Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>
> >>
> >>> I configured the design wiki rights like others sub wikis rights.
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Thomas Mortagne
> >>> <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
> >>> > Sounds like "code" css class is broken in that skin
(this class
is
> >>> > supposed to follow
newlines and white spaces like <pre>).
> >>> >
> >>> > On Mon, Nov 18, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Jeremie BOUSQUET
> >>> > <jeremie.bousquet(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >>> >> Another thing, seems now the {{code}} macro puts everything on
one
> line
> >>> ...
> >>> >> (at least, for unauthentified user).
> >>> >> Same page:
> >>> >>
> http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/MailArchiveApplication
> >>> >>
> >>> >> BR,
> >>> >> Jeremie
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> 2013/11/18 Marius Dumitru Florea <
mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>> Someone else complained to me about this rights issue too
and I
> >>> couldn't
> >>> >>> reproduce with my user because I have special rights.
> >>> >>> On Nov 15, 2013 5:18 PM, "Jeremie BOUSQUET"
<
> >>> jeremie.bousquet(a)gmail.com>
> >>> >>> wrote:
> >>> >>>
> >>> >>> > Hello,
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> > Maybe it's not finished yet or I missed
something, but if I
> browse
> >>> this
> >>> >>> > page:
> >>> >>> >
> http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/MailArchiveApplication
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> > If I'm not authentified, I can see the page.
> >>> >>> > If I log in (in order to edit the page), I can't
even see the
> page
> >>> ("You
> >>> >>> > are not allowed to view this document or perform this
action
> ...").
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> > 2013/11/15 Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
<valicac(a)gmail.com>
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> > > Hi,
> >>> >>> > >
> >>> >>> > >
> >>> >>> > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 6:15 PM, Vincent Massol
<
> >>> vincent(a)massol.net>
> >>> >>> > > wrote:
> >>> >>> > >
> >>> >>> > > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2013 at 4:43 PM, Ecaterina
Moraru
(Valica)
<
on
and
> >>> thus
> >>> >>> > > creation
> >>> >>> > > > date/author and last modified date/author
since ideally
the
>>
>>> > > > valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > > Hi,
>> >>> > > > >
>> >>> > > > > I've finished moving the content from
>> >>> > > > >
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/WebHome and
>> >>> > > > > http://incubator.myxwiki.org (Improvements,
Standards,
Tech,
>> >>> Mockups
>> >>> > > > > spaces) to the new wiki
>> >>> > > > > http://design.xwiki.org/
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > Woohoo :) Nice progress from before, well done!
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > Some quick comments:
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > > * Is it possible to remove the centered thing and do
the
same as
>>> on
>>> >>> > other
>>> >>> > > > subwikis of xwiki.org? (consistency!)
>>> >>> > > >
>>> >>> > >
>>> >>> > > The proposal pages are full width just like the other
pages >>
>>> xwiki.org
>> >>> > .
>> >>> > > The only centered page is design:Main.WebHome which is
consistent
>>> with
>>> >>> > > xwiki:Main.WebHome. I won't change that.
>>> >>> > >
>>> >>> > >
>>> >>> > > > * It's a real pity that you seem to have
lost the history > LT
> >>> should
> >>> >>> > be
> >>> >>> > > > filtered by latest proposal first (as for
the Extensions
of
>> e.x.o).
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > Just like on e.x.o the livetable is filtered after
'Last
modified'.
>> >>> Pages
>> >>> > > on design.xwiki.org have suffered modifications (objects
added,
>>> etc.)
>>> >>> so
>>> >>> > > it's normal that they are modified in the past
week.
>>> >>> > > I haven't lost the history (except for 4 pages).
All the > were
> >>> >>> > created
> >>> >>> > > by me because that's how we handle import
and copy (see
> >>> >>> > > http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-925)
> >>> >>> > >
> >>> >>> > >
> >>> >>> > > > * I think you've been a bit
overzeleaous in changing
states
of
>>> >>> > > proposals...
>>> >>> > > > going to try to fix some. At least that's a
good way to
reset
> >>> >>> > everything
> >>> >>> > > :)
> >>> >>> > > >
> >>> >>> > >
> >>> >>> > > I used scripts: copied the state from old
dev:Design space,
> added
> >>> >>> > > 'completed' state for the incubator
pages. I've updated >> statuses
>> >>> for
>> >>> > > some of them, yes.
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > > * "Active" vs "Dormant" is too
hard IMO. What's the
criteria? For
>>> >>> > example
>>> >>> > > >
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/APM Nobody >>> working
>>> >>> > > > actively but it's something I believe we
need and it's
still
> >>> valid.
> >>> >>> > What
> >>> >>> > > > about
> >>> >>> >
> http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/AlternateURLSchemeI'm
> >>> >>> > > > working on it, once every 4 months. I think
these 2 are
>>> too
>>> >>> hard
>>> >>> > > to
>>> >>> > > > maintain because nobody is going to move them
from Active
to
>>
Dormant.
>> >>> > I'd
>> >>> > > > suggest we replace both "Active" and
"Dormant" by "Open"
because
>> I
>> >>> > don't
>> >>> > > > think we need to separate them. "Open"
should list all
designs
>>> about
>>> >>> > > things
>>> >>> > > > that we wish to do. Those that we don't want
to do should in
>>> >>> > > "Dropped".
>>> >>> > > > WDYT?
>>> >>> > > >
>>> >>> > >
>>> >>> > > I have a list with like 5 variants of states we could
have
for
> this
> >>> >>> app.
> >>> >>> > If
> >>> >>> > > you really want to have this discussion about
the naming we
> could,
> >>> but
> >>> >>> > the
> >>> >>> > > current variant is: 'Idea',
'Active', 'Dormant', > >>> >>>
'Dropped'.
> >>> >>> > > Because we had the discussion about the Status
of the
project
> at
> >>> the
> >>> >>> > > seminar and that is not visible what is on going
and what
we
> might
> >>> want
> >>> >>> > to
> >>> >>> > > achieve, I've added the 2 states. If we are
going to add
(Not
> >>> planned)
> >>> >>> > also
> >>> >>> > > a 'Target' column to specify the version
we want to release
> that
> >>> >>> feature,
> >>> >>> > > having an 'Active' state is important
since it shows the
> features
> >>> we
> >>> >>> are
> >>> >>> > > really working on.
> >>> >>> > >
> >>> >>> > > We could have like a job that listens if a page
was not
> modified
> >>> for a
> >>> >>> > > certain period of time and change the status
from 'Active'
to
> >>> 'Dormant'
> >>> >>> > > (Not planned).
> >>> >>> > >
> >>> >>> > > As mentioned in my early mail I don't really
know the
status
of
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/CAPTCHAIntegration#Historyrea…
>>
others'
>> >>> > > proposals so that's why I asked of you if you could
update
them in
>> >>> order
>> >>> > to
>> >>> > > be accurate.
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > > * Is
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > >
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>>
> >>> >>> > > >
"Dropped"? Shouldn't it be "Completed"?
> >>> >>> > > >
> >>> >>> > >
> >>> >>> > > I haven't changed the Status of this
proposal, so this is
how
> it
> >>> must
> >>> >>> > have
> >>> >>> > > been put by Jerome on devs wiki. Actually the
devs status
was
> >>> 'Dead'
> >>> >>> > which
> >>> >>> > > in the new application is marked as
'Dropped'.
> >>> >>> > >
> >>> >>> > >
> >>> >>> > > > * I don't understand how you categorize
designs and how
you
link
>>> them
>>> >>> > > > together, for ex:
>>> >>> > > >
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/SearchLucene
> >>> >>> > > >
> >>> >>> > >
> >>> >>> > > The proposals are linked together by using the
parent/child
> >>> >>> relationship.
> >>> >>> > >
> >>> >>> > >
> >>> >>> > > > * I don't really understand why you
consider "Design" to > >>> about UI
> >>> >>> > > > only... For ex
> >>> >>> > > >
> http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/AlternateURLSchemeis
> >>> >>> > > purely
> >>> >>> > > > design and you categorized it as
"Feature".
> >>> >>> > >
> >>> >>> > >
> >>> >>> > > For me what is related to visual aspects is
'Design', what
is
>>> related
>>> >>> to
>>> >>> > > code is 'Implementation'. We could discuss
and add more
states
> but
> >>> I've
> >>> >>> > > tried to pick the easiest ones.
> >>> >>> > >
> >>> >>> >
> >>> >>> > I agree with Vincent, in practice the page about Mail
work
>>> on
>>> >>> > (listed above) describes both UI and Code of the app. By
the
way
it
>>> >>> > contradicts the name of the whole subwiki
("design.xwiki.org
"),
> >>> >>> > considering
> >>> >>> > the scope of this subwiki is not limited to proposals
on
>>> aspects,
>>> >>> so
>>> >>> > it should not be the same term IMO for the whole subwiki
and
for
this
>>> >>> > category Design (vs Implementation), or then you should
call
the
>>
subwiki
>> >>> "
>> >>> > design-and-implementation.xwiki.org" :) . Design vs
Implementation
>>> makes
>>> >>> > me
>>> >>> > think of Architecture vs Code but maybe it's a > to
> >>> be set
> >>> >>> > as
> >>> >>> > > parent or use the current as feature).
> >>> >>> > >
> >>> >>> > >
> >>> >>> > > > I also don't understand what
> >>> >>> > > > "Feature'" means. And why a
proposal of "Design" cannot
> include
> >>> >>> > > > requirements?
> >>> >>> > >
> >>> >>> > >
> >>> >>> > > This was a limitation of the application (I was
displaying
> related
> >>> >>> pages
> >>> >>> > > livetable just for Feature proposal), now is
fixed. If a
page
> have
> >>> >>> > children
> >>> >>> > > it will display them.
> >>> >>> > > Again if you find something that is misplaced
please help
me
fix
Status
>> it.
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > Thanks,
>> >>> > > Caty
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > > Or is it just the "latest" stage it's in but
that doesn't
>> >>> > > > mean much in agile dev since the design and code work
together
>>> and
>>> >>> are
>>> >>> > > > cycling in small iterations... :)
>>> >>> > > >
>>> >>> > > > Thanks!
>>> >>> > > > -Vincent
>>> >>> > > >
>>> >>> > > >
>>> >>> > > > >
>>> >>> > > > >
>>> >>> > > > > Since I've been using scripts, the
Participants and >>
might
>> >>> not
>> >>> > be
>> >>> > > > > accurate since I marked most of them as
Completed. Feel
free to
>>> >>> mark
>>> >>> > > your
>>> >>> > > > > proposal accordingly and maybe even change
the parent
>>> hierarchy if
>>> >>> > you
>>> >>> > > > find
>>> >>> > > > > your proposal in the wrong place.
>>> >>> > > > >
>>> >>> > > > > Thanks,
>>> >>> > > > > Caty
>>> >>> > > > >
>>> >>> > > > >
>>> >>> > > > >
>>> >>> > > > > On Sat, Nov 5, 2011 at 4:20 PM, Thomas
Mortagne
>>> >>> > > > > <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>wrote;wrote:
>>> >>> > > > >
>>> >>> > > > > > On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 3:50 PM,
Ecaterina Moraru > >>> design
> >>> >>> and
> >>> >>> > > > > > architecture. It would make more
sense used as the
name
of a
new
>> >>> github
>> >>> > > > > > repository/organization associated to this
wiki for
example.
>>> >>> > > > > >
>>> >>> > > > > > >
>>> >>> > > > > > > *C*. UI on how a Proposal will be
displayed in this >>
wiki
>> >>> > > (example
>> >>> > > > > > > AppWithinMinutes):
>> >>> > > > > > >
>> >>> > > > > >
>> >>> > > > >
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > >
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>>
>>> >>> > > > > >
>>> >>> > > > > > Looks very nice. Same as Denis,
it's very important
that
> >>> it's as
> >>> >>> > easy
> >>> >>> > > > > > as possible to use and not a
constraint in order to
> actually
> >>> be
> >>> >>> > used.
> >>> >>> > > > > >
> >>> >>> > > > > > >
> >>> >>> > > > > > >
------------------------------------------------
> >>> >>> > > > > > > *Long version: *
> >>> >>> > > > > > >
> >>> >>> > > > > > > Right now development
process activities are in
> >>> >>> multiple
> >>> >>> > > > > places:
> >>> >>> > > > > > > - Analysis + Architecture:
> >>> >>> > > >
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/
> >>> >>> > > > > > > - Analysis + User
Interface:
> >>> >>> > > > > > >
> http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/
> >>> >>> > > > > > > - Other:
http://xwiki.markmail.org/,
> http://jira.xwiki.org
> >>> ,
> >>> >>> > chats,
> >>> >>> > > > git
> >>> >>> > > > > > > comments, etc.
> >>> >>> > > > > > >
> >>> >>> > > > > > > This process can be hard to
optimize and
information
is
before
>>> hard to
>>> >>> > > track
>>> >>> > > > > if
>>> >>> > > > > > > you are looking for specific
information.
>>> >>> > > > > > > And the worst part of it is that
is hard to
automatize
and
>>> lots
>>> >>> > of
>>> >>> > > > the
>>> >>> > > > > > > items need manual gathering or
search.
>>> >>> > > > > > >
>>> >>> > > > > > > *Part A. *
>>> >>> > > > > > > This mail is about combining
>>> >>> > > > > >
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Design/and
>>> >>> > > > > > > http://incubator.myxwiki.org/
work in a single
place.
> >>> >>> > > > > > > This has already been
discussed several times (
> >>> >>> > > > > > >
http://xwiki.markmail.org/thread/kc32dufsf7nyyt6sand
> >>> >>> > > >
> > > http://xwiki.markmail.org/thread/izj6aiyodwqia4vl)
> and the
> >>> >>> vote
> >>> >>> > > was
> >>> >>> > > > > > > favorable in this
direction.
> >>> >>> > > > > > > The proposal was to create a
new wiki called
> >>> >>> design.xwiki.orgthat
> >>> >>> > > > > will
> >>> >>> > > > > > > contain the combined
information and that will
target
> >>> >>> developers.
> >>> >>> > > > > > >
> >>> >>> > > > > > > The new wiki will be used to
gather only proposal's
> >>> development
> >>> >>> > > > process
> >>> >>> > > > > > > information: requirements,
architecture, solutions
> >>> >>> alternatives,
> >>> >>> > > user
> >>> >>> > > > > > > interface variants,
planning, etc. for a specific
> >>> >>> > > > > > feature/idea/improvement.
> >>> >>> > > > > > > After the proposal is
implemented it will be
properly
>>> >>> documented
>>> >>> > in
>>> >>> > > > the
>>> >>> > > > > > > right location for users (ex
platform.xwiki.org).
>>> >>> > > > > > > It is acceptable to have CSS + JS
code on this wiki
in
> >>> order to
> >>> >>> > > > > > demonstrate
> >>> >>> > > > > > > the functionality of the
proposals, but we should add
dev.xwiki.org:
> >>> Design
> >>> >>> > will
> >>> >>> > > be
> >>> >>> > > > > > moved
> >>> >>> > > > > > > gradually after the new wiki
is created.
> >>> >>> > > > > > >
> >>> >>> > > > > > > *Part B. *
> >>> >>> > > > > > > You should state your
opinion regarding which name >> >>> > > > > >
> experimental/dangerous code (groovy scripts, jars,
etc.).
>> For
>> >>> > this
>> >>> > > > case
>> >>> > > > > > it
>> >>> > > > > > > is advisable to use a test machine,
share your own
>> instance or
>> >>> > use
>> >>> > > > the
>> >>> > > > > > > contrib.xwiki.org repository for
hosting.
>> >>> > > > > > >
>> >>> > > > > > > The version upgrades will be handle by
a community
admin
>>> and
>>> >>> the
>>> >>> > > wiki
>>> >>> > > > > > > gardening by me.
>>> >>> > > > > > >
>>> >>> > > > > > > The data from
incubator.myxwiki.org and
>>> better
>>> >>> for
>>> >>> > > the
>>> >>> > > > > new
>>> >>> > > > > > > wiki:
>>> >>> > > > > > > - design.xwiki.org
>>> >>> > > > > > > - incubator.xwiki.org
>>> >>> > > > > > > - we accept other proposals.
>>> >>> > > > > > >
>>> >>> > > > > > > *Part C.*
>>> >>> > > > > > > I've made a proposal on how a
proposal page would
look
>>
like:
>> >>> > > > > > >
>> >>> > > > > >
>> >>> > > > >
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > >
>> >>> >
>> >>>
>>
> >>> >>> > > >
> > >
> >>> >>> > > > > > > The proposal page will
gather all the information
> related
> >>> to
> >>> >>> it,
> >>> >>> > > > making
> >>> >>> > > > > > it
> >>> >>> > > > > > > easier to track it's
progress.
> >>> >>> > > > > > >
> >>> >>> > > > > > > The entries will be
separated depending on 4
> categories:
> >>> >>> > Analysis,
> >>> >>> > > > > > > Architecture, User Interface
and Implementation,
each
>>> category
>>> >>> > > having
>>> >>> > > > > > it's
>>> >>> > > > > > > own status, participants, jiras
and timeframe.
>>> >>> > > > > > > Categories are not mandatory for
all proposals,
smaller
> >>> >>> proposals
> >>> >>> > > > will
> >>> >>> > > > > > have
> >>> >>> > > > > > > just the related pages for
certain areas.
> >>> >>> > > > > > > Each proposal will store
it's data in a dedicated
> space.
> >>> >>> > > > > > >
> >>> >>> > > > > > > The implementation of the
proposal will be handled me.
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>> >>> > > > > >
>
>> >>> > > > > > > Let me know what you think.
>> >>> > > > > > > Thanks,
>> >>> > > > > > > Caty
>> >>> > > > > > >
_______________________________________________
>> >>> > > > > > > devs mailing list
>> >>> > > > > > > devs(a)xwiki.org
>> >>> > > > > > >
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>> >>> > > > > > >
>> >>> > > > > >
>> >>> > > > > >
>> >>> > > > > >
>> >>> > > > > > --
>> >>> > > > > > Thomas Mortagne
>> >>> > > > > >
_______________________________________________
>> >>> > > > > > devs mailing list
>> >>> > > > > > devs(a)xwiki.org
>> >>> > > > > >
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>> >>> > > > > >
>> >>> > > > > _______________________________________________
>> >>> > > > > devs mailing list
>> >>> > > > > devs(a)xwiki.org
>> >>> > > > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>> >>> > > > >
>> >>> > > > _______________________________________________
>> >>> > > > devs mailing list
>> >>> > > > devs(a)xwiki.org
>> >>> > > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>> >>> > > >
>> >>> > > _______________________________________________
>> >>> > > devs mailing list
>> >>> > > devs(a)xwiki.org
>> >>> > > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>> >>> > >
>> >>> > _______________________________________________
>> >>> > devs mailing list
>> >>> > devs(a)xwiki.org
>> >>> > http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>> >>> >
>> >>> _______________________________________________
>> >>> devs mailing list
>> >>> devs(a)xwiki.org
>> >>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>> >>>
>> >> _______________________________________________
>> >> devs mailing list
>> >> devs(a)xwiki.org
>> >> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > Thomas Mortagne
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thomas Mortagne
>> _______________________________________________
>> devs mailing list
>> devs(a)xwiki.org
>> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>>
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> devs(a)xwiki.org
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne
--
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs