2 Sep
2008
2 Sep
'08
2:15 p.m.
On Aug 28, 2008, at 9:37 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 5:23 PM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
This is now implemented but with a small difference: parameters are
specified using (%...%)
This makes it more readable and easier to parse (different begin and
end tokens).
Now "all" that is left is for Thomas to add support for tables in the
XWiki renderers ;)
Thanks
-Vincent
On Aug 18, 2008, at 10:38 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
This syntax looks good to me, I like the very simple syntax as a
default where we can add details when needed.
On Jul 27, 2008, at 7:18 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
I was wrong. I've talked to Mikhail from wikimodel and what he's done
for the wikimodel common syntax is to allow parameters for tables in
the following manner:
* Parameters at the table level:
{{tableParam=value ...}}
|| column 1 || column 2
cell 1 | cell 2
* Parameters at the column level:
|| {{columnParam=value ...}} column 1 || column 2
cell 1 | cell 2
* Parameters at the line level:
|| column 1 || column 2
{{lineParam=value ...}} | Cell 1 | Cell 2
* Parameters at the cell level:
|| column 1 || column 2
{{cellParam=value...}} cell 1 | cell 2
He says it's easy to do the same for the XWiki Parser in wikimodel.
Of course we'll need to change the parameter delimiter since {{ }}
are
already used for macros for the xwiki syntax. But we could use
something like %% I guess.
So I'm now more in favor of having a wiki syntax for tables instead
of
a macro.
WDYT?
On Jul 23, 2008, at 6:05 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
> Some open issues/questions:
>
> 1) I think we need a syntax for escaping a block of text. I'd
> propose
> using {{{whatever here}}} (same as creole and confluence). We
> could do
> it with a macro but I don't know how we could implement it
> easily...
Still not sure. Most said they liked the {{{ }}} notation. Right
now
I've implemented the {{nowiki}} macro. Do we still want/need this
at
the wiki syntax level?
I think we do since it'll easier to type than {{nowiki}}. I'll
create an issue in wikimodel to add it since we were all in
agreement.
See http://code.google.com/p/wikimodel/issues/detail?id=38
I guess I'll just remove the nowiki macro when it's done.
[snip]
> 4) Tables: do we keep the table macro or do
we want a wiki syntax
> for
> tables.
Also need more input.
My take is that we should go with a macro since this allows us to
have more options like filterable/sortable/pageable/etc than a wiki
syntax.