Re: [xwiki-devs] [GSOC]Velocity syntax support for XE

Hi Fabio/Vincent Today I tried to update the sandbox.But I was unable to update my code.It gives the following error :( svn: PROPFIND request failed on '/svnroot/sandbox/xeclipse-gsoc' svn: PROPFIND of '/svnroot/sandbox/xeclipse-gsoc': 403 Forbidden (https://svn.xwiki.org ) What should I do. Is something wrong ?

On Sun, Jul 27, 2008 at 6:09 PM, Fabio Mancinelli <fabio.mancinelli(a)xwiki.com On 26 juil. 08, at 20:45, malaka ekanayake wrote: Hi all, Now I've completed (committed to the sandbox) the syntax colouring for most of the Velocity syntax. The colours used are not yet finalized. We are yet to develop colour scheme for both Xiki and Velocity syntax. Your suggestions for appropriate colours are welcome. I am not a graphic designer so I will not have suggestions for the color schemes. From an engineering point of view, it is clear that a some point the color scheme must be configurable and not hard-coded into the source code (see ColorProvider). This is not too difficult and we can leave it out for later, once all the other functionalities will be implemented (i.e., let's give this feature a low priority for now). I've identified following tasks which are to be completed. 1) support for user defined macros in Velocity 2) Enhance the Xwiki content assistance. 3) Implement the Velocity content assistance 4) Implement the Xwiki and Velocity error handling AFAIS, for the 4th task we have to integrate Xwiki and Velocity parsers to get the error messages and to find the excat location of the error. Your comments are welcom on this. This is indeed a good idea. So we can take advantage of the velocity parser output in order to put error markers and messages in the editor. However I don't know the Velocity parser's API and the granularity of its error messages. So this might require a bit of investigation. I suggest you to spend some time (i.e., not more than a day) on this topic, since it will bring a nice feature in. I would prioritize your task list in the following way: 3,4,2,1 By the way, what are the enhancements to the content assistance you would like to target? I would like to suggest following changes to the existing package sturcture of xeclipse plugin. Now this editor plugin supports different languages, I think refactoring of the package stucture is needed. For the moment, I've included Velocity related classes under the following package name. org.xwiki.eclipse.ui.editors.velocity.* And also several other classes has been modified provide syntax coloring for Velocity. So my suggetion is to put all the Xwiki related classes under the following package name. org.xwiki.eclipse.ui.editors.xwiki.* Then the common classes can be put in the org.org.xwiki.eclipse.ui.editors and org.xwiki.eclipse.ui.editors.util packages. Not sure... org.xwiki.eclipse.ui.editors.xwiki.* is a bit weird because org.xwiki.eclipse.ui.editors already suggests that the editors we are talking about are about xwiki, so org.xwiki.eclipse.ui.editors.xwiki.* seems rather redundant. Maybe org.xwiki.eclipse.ui.editors.default.* is a better name. Anyway I see your point and I agree. Let's think about it. Finally, thank you for the good job! :) Cheers, Fabio