14 Dec
2009
14 Dec
'09
10:22 a.m.
Vincent Massol wrote:
On Dec 13, 2009, at 1:36 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
+1
Thanks,
Marius
Before voting please consider that this will
break a lot of existing
code which is currently using org.xwiki.bridge.DocumentName (since
it would now be named org.xwiki.model.DocumentName).
Do we want to keep org.xwiki.bridge.DocumentName (and all the others
too) and deprecate them?
IMO it depends if we agree that 2.2 will introduce the new model or
not.
WDYT?
Note that I have now finished the refactoring locally and I'm waiting
for a decision. FYI there are 93 files impacted but most are tests or
files which don't expose APIs. In term of APIs there are probably
something like 20 methods whose signature have changed (mostly from
org.xwiki.bridge.DocumentName to org.xwiki.model.DocumentName).
For developers it means replace "bridge" by "model" in imports. This
is not a big change but it means they need to re-release whatever
"extensions" they have done (if they used the bridge) when they move
to XE 2.2.
Personally I don't see any way of moving forward for the new model
without breaking some backward compat and the bridge was always
flagged as being temporary so I'm +1 to go ahead. I'd also like to
continue working on the model in the 2.2 timeframe to ensure that what
we release for 2.2 final will be stable (for example by introducing
the WikiResourceName discussed in the other mail thread on the new
model).
Thanks
-Vincent
On Dec 13, 2009, at 10:35 AM, Vincent Massol
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> New proposal:
> Create a new xwiki-model and move "clean" classes from xwiki-bridge
> into it. These are:
> - *AttachmentName*
> - *DocumentName*
>
> Here's my +1
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 1:12 PM, Thomas Mortagne
> <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Aug 26, 2009 at 18:00, Vincent Massol<vincent(a)massol.net>
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Since we have some final classes (final in the sense with a good
>>> architecture) in xwiki-bridge I'd like to rename it into xwiki-
>>> model
>>> so that we can start this model module.
>>>
>>> Note: We'd still have a org.xwiki.model.bridge package for the time
>>> being in that xwiki-model module.
>>>
>>> Here's my +1
>> I would prefer to create a new xwiki-model with only the clean apis
>> instead of having clean and bridge in the same project.
>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs