18 Jul
2007
18 Jul
'07
8:37 p.m.
On 7/18/07, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
On Jul 16, 2007, at 6:10 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
On Jul 16, 2007, at 5:00 PM, Asiri Rathnayake wrote:
On 7/16/07, Asiri Rathnayake <asiri.rathnayake(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Thanks. BTW, i'm having problems with xwiki-dev list(or so it seems). Was
the dev-list quite for past couple of days ? or is it that we cannot send
mails to it ? I'm confused. I sent a mail today morning but it looks like it
still hasn't reached the list. let's hope this one reaches the destination.
- Asiri
-Vincent
On 7/16/07, Vincent Massol < vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
After writing this mail I had second thoughts whether this was a
appropriate question to ask, kind of feeling guilty...
In any case, please apologize me....
Don't feel bad, this is a very relevant and natural question :)
You do have this right of course as there are only so many ways of
implementing UI in Eclipse. However if your code has too many similarities
with the code from igloo they'd have the right to sue you/us. I think the
best is really not to look at that code and redo that part.
I found this interesting related to somewhere similar:
http://www.reactos.org/wiki/index.php/Audit
[snip]
Hi Tharindu,
I have done a first pass on the code review and I have a few comments:
1) You seem to have use Cloudgarden's Jigloo and unfortunately the
license isn't good enough for us so we cannot use it... Here's what it says
in the generated file:
/**
* This code was edited or generated using CloudGarden's Jigloo
SWT/Swing GUI Builder, which is free
* for non-commercial use. If Jigloo is being used commercially (ie, by
a corporation, company or
* business for any purpose whatever) then you should purchase a
license for each developer using
* Jigloo. Please visit www.cloudgarden.com for details. Use of Jigloo
implies acceptance of these
* licensing terms. A COMMERCIAL LICENSE HAS NOT BEEN PURCHASED FOR
THIS MACHINE, SO JIGLOO OR THIS
* CODE CANNOT BE USED LEGALLY FOR ANY CORPORATE OR COMMERCIAL PURPOSE.
*/
We cannot use Jigloo because we want commercial companies using XWiki
under the LGPL license. Thus we cannot commit this code.
Could you find some alternative? The UI doesn't seem too complex so I
should be easy to do it by hand I think.
I was thinking whether it would be legal (and ethical) if we look at
jigloo generated code and write our own code (without copy and paste...) ?.
I really have this doubt over all open source software, what if some
commercial vendor looks at XWiki code, rewrite the code, do some feature
additions, remove all the licensing info and claim that it's a new product
(which they own) ?
--
You receive this message as a subscriber of the xwiki-dev(a)objectweb.orgmailing list.
To unsubscribe: mailto:xwiki-dev-unsubscribe@objectweb.org
For general help: mailto:sympa@objectweb.org?subject=help
ObjectWeb mailing lists service home page: http://www.objectweb.org/wws