2014-11-06 11:10 GMT+01:00 Marius Dumitru Florea <
mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com>gt;:
On Thu, Nov 6, 2014 at 11:00 AM, Eduard Moraru
<enygma2002(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
The problem with the current place is that it is
not really natural and
thus not very discoverable at all.
I have this feeling to. I wanted to edit the descriptor of a subwiki a
few days ago and I was surprised I could find anything related in the
subwiki administration.
If you have to set the homepage, owner,
etc of your wiki, you go to administration, but never to "wiki index >
edit
wiki".
I believe that along this thread we have identified that these settings
are
valuable for both the main wiki and subwikis so
this makes editing the
wiki
descriptor a valuable and deserving section to be
introduced in
administration, don`t you agree?
Thanks,
Eduard
On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 4:38 PM, Guillaume "Louis-Marie" Delhumeau <
gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
> 2014-11-05 14:43 GMT+01:00 Eduard Moraru <enygma2002(a)gmail.com>om>:
>
> > Concerning UC3 and UC4, we should not re-invent the wheel. I have just
> > remembered about the fact that we already have the option of setting
the
> > homepage of a wiki exposed in the
wiki's descriptor, so this makes is
> > already configurable.
> >
> > All we need to do now, is to expose this configuration further, in
> > Administration > Configuration, under Wiki section (just like it was
for
> > workspaces, no idea why we removed it
when refactoring to 'wikis'),
>
>
> About this setting in particular it is because it is part of the wiki
> descriptor, and we now have only one place to edit these properties.
>
>
> > where
> > you can select what is the homepage of your current wiki. Selecting
the
> > owner and basically all the other stuff
that you have in a wiki
> descriptor
> > should be done at this same level, since these are very important
> > configurations that one needs to perform for either his main wiki or
> > subwiki.
> >
> > And no, the xwiki-platform-wiki module is not optional (it is part of
the
> > wiki model!), so no point in using a
configurable class and throwing
it
> > back in the 'Applications'
section.
> >
> > This actually goes along the lines of 'Proposal4: Set this page as
> > homepage' [1], but done in Administration, not on every page, like
> Vincent
> > suggested.
> >
> > To get the homepage, apps need to do:
> > $services.wiki.getById($services.wiki.currentWikiId).mainPageReference
> > Of course, this can be improved to
> > $services.wiki.currentWikiDescriptor.mainPageReference
> >
> > We will be still having the backwards compatibility concerns of P4,
> however
> > I am sure that practical solutions (e.g. making Main.WebHome redirect
to
> >
$services.wiki.getById($services.wiki.currentWikiId).mainPageReference,
>> > etc.) can be found if problems arise in daily use.
> >
>> > WDYT?
> >
>> > ----------
>> > [1]
> >
> >
>>
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/HomepageProposal4Setthispag…
> >
>> > On Wed, Oct 29,
2014 at 6:10 PM, Jeremie BOUSQUET <
>> > jeremie.bousquet(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> >
>> > > Hi,
>> > >
>> > > 2014-10-28 21:08 GMT+01:00 vincent(a)massol.net
<vincent(a)massol.net>et>:
>> > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > >
>> > > > On 28 Oct 2014 at 20:28:15, Jeremie BOUSQUET (
>> > jeremie.bousquet(a)gmail.com
>> > > > (mailto:jeremie.bousquet@gmail.com)) wrote:
>> > > >
>> > > > > Hi,
>> > > > > Le 28 oct. 2014 19:39, "Eduard Moraru" a écrit :
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > Hi Vincent,
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 11:05 AM, vincent(a)massol.net
>> > > > > > wrote:
>> > > > > >
>> > > > > > > Hi,
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > On 24 Oct 2014 at 21:18:31, Eduard Moraru (
>> enygma2002(a)gmail.com
>> > > > (mailto:
>> > > > > > > enygma2002(a)gmail.com)) wrote:
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Hi,
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > 2 new proposals (P6 and P7) have been made
recently. I did
>> not
>> > > yet
>> > > > get
>> > > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > chance to add comments/analysis on them. Feel
free to do
it
> in
> > > the
> > > > > > > > meanwhile if anybody wants to.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > A few notes on Jeremie's "Proposal7:
DistrbutionWizard
sets
> the
> > > > > homepage
> > > > > > > of
> > > > > > > > a flavor and the Help App teaches users"
[2]:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Personally, I find it a rather elegant solution
based on
> > > > separation of
> > > > > > > > concerns. However, you need to be aware that it is
a
> > medium/long
> > > > term
> > > > > > > > objective.
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The way I understood it is that we delegate the
task of
> > choosing
> > > a
> > > > > > > homepage
> > > > > > > > to the DistributionWizard that will most likely be
in
charge
> of
> > > > > offering
> > > > > > > > the user flavor options. At that point, the
homepage of
the
> > > current
> > > > > wiki
> > > > > > > > will be the homepage of the user selected flavor.
Optionally,
> > we
> > > > can
> > > > > also
> > > > > > > > propose to use a blank page as homepage if the
user wants,
> > > however
> > > > > this
> > > > > > > > might be a bit of an overkill, since the user can
easily
edit
> > the
> > > > page
> > > > > > > and
> > > > > > > > trash everything.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The DW should not know at all about any page. It should
be
up
> to
> > > the
> > > > > > > flavor to define the wiki pages it will contain and
install.
> Each
> > > > flavor
> > > > > > > should propose its own home page.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Maybe I did not choose the best words, but the way I
understood
> it
> > > (and
> > > > > > tried to reformulate it) was not that the DW explicitly
allows
> you
> > to
> > > > > > select a homepage, but that indirectly, through allowing you
to
> > > > install a
> > > > > > flavor, it will additionally do the job (again, indirectly)
of
> > making
> > > > you
> > > > > > choose a homepage (through the flavor you have selected).
> > > > >
> > > > > Yes that was the idea, possibly:
> > > > > - DW doesn't have to know pages or set homepage
> > > > > - there could be a new wizard, similar to wizards for new page /
> > space
> > > > from
> > > > > template, that allows choosing a kind of homepage (empty, wiki
> > > concepts,
> > > > > dashboard, etc)
> > > > > - a flavor also adds its homepage as a possible
"template"
> > > > > - btw it could be exactly the new space from template page, but
> with
> > > more
> > > > > choices than current (empty / dashboard)
> > > > > - following a dw run and a flavor installation, this "new
Main
> space
> > > > > homepage from template" wizard is triggered and displayed
(or
just
> > > > proposed
> > > > > to user through a button or link), and allows user to either
choose
> > > > default
> > > > > homepage of the flavor, or use another one
> > > > > - current (or reworked) homepage is just the default home of the
> > > default
> > > > > flavor (which is the current XE xar)
> > > >
> > > > ok but:
> > > >
> > > > 1) it’s complex since it means that a flavor would need to
register
> > some
> > > > kind of post install script to execute (which is something we
don’t
> > > really
> > > > have)
> > > >
> > >
> > > Depends, I was thinking more about a specific event like "flavor
> > installed"
> > > or "extension installed" or "wiki installed / updated".
I'm not
sure to
> > get
> > > what you would need to do in this post install script ?
> > > But it could be completely "manual" or just a link at the end of
DW
to
> > some
> > > possible post-install stuff (like, consult help, manage home page,
> etc).
> > >
> > > I'd like to apologize here because my "proposal" was more an
idea
than
> a
> > > well formalized proposal, even if it ended up in the list of
proposals,
> > > it's obvious that it misses
some thoughts and clarifications... (I
> > > understand your -1).
> > >
> > >
> > > > 2) it negates a bit the point of a flavor which is to propose a
> defined
> > > > “theme” and thus a defined home page matching that theme
> > > >
> > >
> > > Well, if you consider that current UI of XE is the default xwiki
> > "flavor",
> > > this is exactly what it's about when we talk about switching home
page
> > > easily, isn't it ? We want to
let user set a home page that doesn't
> match
> > > the default theme freely. Obviously this default theme is not very
> > > "thematic" as it's the default and should be versatile ...
> > > Home page matching that theme could still be the mostly recommended
> > choice.
> > > BTW a flavor, with such mechanism, could provide several "home
page"
> > > variants and not only one, depending on the case.
> > > If I take the case of a flavor based on the Mail archive (or the
mail
> > > archive extension alone, say), it
already provides different views
as
> the
> > > app home page (timeline, livetable, etc). Currently the switch is
done
> > > through conditional include.
Currently that app home page is
> > > MailArchive.WebHome, if I could register it as a possible home page
> > > template, it would avoid having to rename it "Main.WebHome" to
make
it
> a
> > > flavor (and potentially destroy existing wiki home page by mistake
when
> > you
> > > install that extension/flavor), and I could fullfill both
installation
> > > use-cases (of using it as an app
among others in some wiki, and as a
> > > wiki-wide-flavor in another wiki or subwiki), from the same xar
bundled
> > > app.
> > > Again, here, I talk about possibilities and use-cases that seem
logical
> > or
> > > interesting to me if I dig into my proposal, but I really don't
know if
> > > it's a good path or even a good
idea for xwiki - I may not have the
big
> > > picture :)
> > > Also, the proposal certainly does not offer any solution for
short-term
> > (if
> > > you consider it provides options for long-term ;-) )
> > >
> > >
> > > > 3) it doesn’t solve anything since once you select a default
homepage
> > you
> > > > still need a way to change it afterwards if you want to change it…
> > > >
> > >
> > > There was the side-idea of the proposal (not well formulated, maybe
was
> > > just in my mind) that this wizard
and/or DW could be triggered at
any
> > later
> > > time by an admin if he wants to replace homepage with some other
> > "default"
> > > content. Maybe could be seen as a "personalization" step
following a
> new
> > > wiki install or upgrade, but that could be triggered at any later
time
> to
> > > "re-personalize" his wiki. I would put this then also as a
feature
in
> > admin
> > > UI.
> > > The difference with some other proposals, is that it would not be an
> > action
> > > available from the standard UI but limited to a post-install step
and
> the
> > > admin UI (not like the variant below).
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > > I don’t see how this is much better than having a Admin UI
allowing
> you
> > > to
> > > > change the home page you wish to have. However it’s a lot more
> complex
> > > (and
> > > > really marginally better).
> > > >
> > > > > Maybe instead of all this, it could be enough to unrelate the
"new
> > > space"
> > > > > and "apply space homepage template" features ?
> > > > > So I would just have to call "space / apply template"
to replace
> the
> > > > > homepage of any space already existing (including Main
obviously) ?
> > > >
> > > > Yes that’s better already IMO but then it should be a menu option
to
> > > > replace any page content with
a page template.
> > > >
> > >
> > > I'm not sure if you talk about an additional option, or an option
that
> > > would replace the "space
/apply template" by a more generic "page /
> apply
> > > template", but I don't think anyway that a page template is the
same
> > thing
> > > as a home page template (whether it's a space or wiki home page).
You'd
> > > seldom want to use a blog post as a
home page ...
> > >
> > > In this variant, there's still the question, if applying such
template
> is
> > > considered an admin operation or not. If it's an admin operation,
you
> > also
> > > proposed to start moving those admin actions to the admin UI, which
is
> -
> > > sort of - what was my proposal about in first place :) (I didn't
talk
> > > specifically about admin UI at that
time, but about avoiding to
crowd
> > > standard UI menus with
unfrequent/admin operations).
> > > That being said I don't think it's an admin action, if you need to
> > protect
> > > home page, as an admin you can set specific rights and forbid this
> "apply
> > > template" to people that don't have those edit rights. I'm not
sure
> > editing
> > > home page and applying a template should really be different in
terms
> of
> > > privileges. But applying a template on an existing page or home
page,
> > seems
> > > to be a rather unfrequent operation.
> > >
> > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Thanks
> > > > -Vincent
> > > >
> > > > > > It was just a high level view on the direction to follow,
and
> not a
> > > > > > specific technical aspect, so no reason to -1 it, right?
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > > BTW there’s also another variation for the home page
that
> hasn’t
> > > been
> > > > > > > discussed yet:
> > > > > > > * Make the home page special by not making it editable
(and
> > without
> > > > any
> > > > > > > docextra tabs at the bottom). So no rollback
issue/edit
> > weirdness.
> > > > > > > * Only admins can change it and only through the Admin
UI
> > > (basically
> > > > > > > decide which space home page to display on the wiki
home
page).
> > > > > > > * Somewhere in
the content of the default home page or
through
> > the
> > > > first
> > > > > > > time wizard, direct the users to the Sandbox page to
try it
out
> > > > editing
> > > > > > > (since this is what Sandbox is for!)
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Adding this too and I think we`re good for going forward
with
a
> > vote,
> > > > > since
> > > > > > we have plenty of proposals.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Eduard
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Thanks
> > > > > > > -Vincent
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The task of teaching the user is delegated
exclusively to
the
> > > Help
> > > > > > > > Application, with the note that the application
will also
be
> > > > proposed
> > > > > to
> > > > > > > > the user to be redirected to, as a final step in
the DW
> (after
> > > the
> > > > > > > > installation of the user selected flavor is
complete).
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > All of this assumes that we have a properly
working
Flavors
> > > feature
> > > > > and
> > > > > > > > Help Application. However, what should we do in
the
meanwhile
> > for
> > > > the
> > > > > > > > default XWiki Enterprise UI / Flavor / build?
Should we
> > postpone
> > > > yet
> > > > > > > again
> > > > > > > > any work on the homepage until we have the needed
elements to
>> > > > delegate
>> > > > > > > the
>> > > > > > > > problematic aspects, or should we do
something about it in
>> the
>> > > > > meanwhile?
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > > > > Eduard
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > ----------
>> > > > > > > > [1]
>> > > >
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/HomepageProposals
>> > > > > > > > [2]
>> > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > >
>> > > > >
>> > > >
>> > >
> >
>>
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/HomepageProposal7Distrbutio…
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 14, 2014 at 12:40 PM, Guillaume
"Louis-Marie"
> > > > Delhumeau <
> > > > > > > > gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Hello.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > I have again a new argument against using the
dashboard
and
> > the
> > > > > include
> > > > > > > > > macro in the main page.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > When the user uses the "Inline"
editor to change some
> > gadgets,
> > > > she
> > > > > can
> > > > > > > not
> > > > > > > > > use the rollback action of the main page to
cancel her
> > changes.
> > > > She
> > > > > > > has to
> > > > > > > > > go to the Dashboard page first, and then
rollback her
> changes
> > > > from
> > > > > > > there.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Having an include macro in the default page
is
absolutely
>> not
>> > > > > > > intuitive,
>> > > > > > > > > even if you make it appears more
clearly.
>> > > > > > > > >
>> > > > > > > > > Thanks,
>> > > > > > > > > Guillaume
>> > > > _______________________________________________
>> > > > devs mailing list
>> > > > devs(a)xwiki.org
>> > > >
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>> > > >
>> > > _______________________________________________
>> > > devs mailing list
>> > > devs(a)xwiki.org
>> > >
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>> > >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > devs mailing list
>> > devs(a)xwiki.org
>> >
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
> >
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Guillaume Delhumeau (gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
>> Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
>> Committer on the
XWiki.org project
>> _______________________________________________
>> devs mailing list
>> devs(a)xwiki.org
>>
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>>
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> devs(a)xwiki.org
>
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Guillaume Delhumeau (gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
Committer on the
project
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org