Hi Caty,
On 29 May 2018, at 17:23, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
<valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hi devs,
Just to make sure we are on the same page since there were some ambiguities
on the proposal, I've put some screenshot on how it will look like:
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/IdeaVisibleSave#HProposal10…
Could you give some context to explain why we need a VOTE and what you’re asking to VOTE
about?
AFAIK there’s no need to VOTE on having Visible Save button since:
* We already discussed and decided to implement visible save
* It was already put twice in the roadmap and is currently in the 10.5 roadmap (which is
already started), and nobody complained
So if your email is about bringing some variations to what was decided, it’s fine but why
does it need a VOTE? A simple proposal would have been enough IMO.
This proposal extracts the save controls and puts them
on a fixed bottom
bar.
Does it mean that the vertical space for the editor is constrained and can never be larger
than the viewport minus the vertical space for the save bar?
Also on the
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Proposal/IdeaVisibleSave/after10… screenshot
the bar takes the full width but on the followings screenshots the bar doesn’t. What is
proposed precisely?
Could you explain what’s different between "Proposal for 9.x" and "Proposal
for 10.x" on
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/IdeaVisibleSave#HProposal10…
I’ve checked quickly and I don’t see any difference visually.
There are some problems with the inline mode and with
the responsive
versions.
With the inline version we could decide to keep the current
behavior and have the fixed bar only in Wiki and WYSIWYG modes. I guess we
should do some implementation tests and see what's possible.
What problems?
At this stage I can’t VOTE since I don’t know what’s the question and it seems to be
missing some details (see my questions above).
Thanks
-Vincent
PS: It’s sad that we are so late on the design of visible save since we’ve had months to
plan this. It was already put in a roadmap at least 6 months ago and then not finished and
then put again in the roadmap several months ago. We could have had plenty of time to
discuss/tune this. Now this means we are at risk of not finishing this for 10.5. Let’s
hope we can catch up.
Thanks,
Caty