22 Sep
2017
22 Sep
'17
6:11 p.m.
Hi,
I finally got the time to make another iteration for these comparison
pages.
If anyone want to make modifications on the texts, they are available at:
- http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Drafts/Compare/
- http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Drafts/Compare/XWiki-vs-Confluence/
- http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Drafts/Compare/XWiki-vs-MediaWiki/
They should look like:
- Compare:
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Proposal/XWikiOrg2017/preview_Co…
- XWiki vs. Confluence:
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Proposal/XWikiOrg2017/preview_Co…
- XWiki vs. MediaWiki:
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/download/Proposal/XWikiOrg2017/preview_Me…
I'm curious to know what you think about this version in terms of layout,
validate the content, maybe you have other points that we can compare the
solutions on, maybe I wrote something wrong for the solutions.
Let me know,
Caty
On Tue, May 17, 2016 at 11:17 PM, Bryn Jeffries <bryn.jeffries(a)sydney.edu.au
wrote:
Denis Gervalle said:
your
Yes, we
only maintain documentation for the latest version of XWiki on
xwiki.org (not enough manpower to have decent doc for several versions
ATM).
However, for version 6.2.5 and later, you have a way to mitigate this
limitation. You can install the Scripting Documentation Application on own wiki (see
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Scripting+Documenta
tion+Application).
Thanks, I did not know about this tool, which sounds excellent.
Unless you are using XWiki prior to 4.2 , using
Wiki Component is
definitely
the recommended way to writes Groovy components.
Registering
components "by hand" from a groovy script has many drawbacks not only
the restart one, and you should avoid doing that. The best is of course
to
write the components in Java, and install them as
an extension.
I've found the ability to write small Groovy scripts as components has
been very handy and simpler than writing full extensions in Java. For
utilities that I don't wish to make into public extensions the burden of a
small Groovy script into a proper extension seems prohibitive (although
that may just be that I haven't written one yet, and I'm just a walker at
the bottom of a hill complaining about how high it looks...). Last time I
asked there is was no simple way to install private extensions. Also, I
didn't have much luck writing a proper component in Groovy, which I
sometimes prefer to Java.
_______________________________________________
users mailing list
users(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/users