On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 14:58, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
On Nov 2, 2010, at 1:39 PM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
+1 provided that it's shown in the syntax
display name that this is
still in an experimental state.
It's already displayed like this thomas.
Yes i know, it's more a reason why i vote +1 than a request
Thanks
-Vincent
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 11:10, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to include xwiki/2.1 in the list of available syntaxes by default for
2.6RC1.
>
> Of course the default syntax remains xwiki/2.0.
>
> The rationale is:
> * Get people to know it exist and try it out as early as possible to provide
feedback
>
> Note that it's marked (experimental) in the syntax combo box list so it should be
enough to let people know about its status.
>
> Here's my +1
>
> WDYT?
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne