On 6 Sep 2019, at 10:35, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
On Fri, Sep 6, 2019 at 10:32 AM Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi Simon,
> On 6 Sep 2019, at 10:27, Simon Urli <simon.urli(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> On 05/09/2019 17:40, Simon Urli wrote:
>> On 05/09/2019 17:24, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 5, 2019 at 3:43 PM Simon Urli <simon.urli(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi everyone,
>>>>
>>>> reopening this thread since I started to close some flicker issues as
>>>> part of BFD and got comments for those.
>>>>
>>>> So the last mails on this threads suggested to close the flicker issues
>>>> if we didn't manage to reproduce them locally after a repeated
tests,
>>>> and that we didn't see them after a while.
>>>>
>>>> We didn't vote for those suggestion and I assumed a bit quick that I
>>>> could close some flicker issues that I personally don't remember
about
>>>> on the CI after having tested them locally.
>>>> My point for doing that is the same as for the first mail I posted on
>>>> this thread: those flickers are old, and the code did change enough for
>>>> those to be fixed in a way or another.
>>>
>>> Being old does not always means the code leading to those failures
>>> changed that much.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> Now I might be completely wrong, and the flicker to happen again, but I
>>>> don't think it's a problem since we can really easily open back
the
>>>> issues if it's the case.
>>>>
>>>> The other solution IMO is to indeed keep the issue open and in fact to
>>>> never really close them, because we just don't have time to
investigate
>>>> each of them properly.
>>>>
>>>> I really don't see any value of keeping things open and don't act
on
>>>> them, that's why I suggest to close them after doing the checks we
>>>> suggested before:
>>>> 1. try to repeat locally the failure;
>>>
>>> This is totally useless IMO unless you make sure that your computer is
>>> made super slow some way since that's the reason for most of the
>>> flickering tests.
>>>
>>>> 2. check that we didn't encounter those flickers since last
cycle.
>>>
>>> This one is enough for me but the hard part is to knowing that.
>> Ok, so the proposal is now to check only the age since last time we saw them of
the open flickers before closing them.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> So first question, do we all agree on that?
>>>>
>>>> Then for the second check, Vincent suggested to add some tooling: it
>>>> will be best, but it takes time to do. So on the meantime, as Thomas
>>>> also suggested, we could add a check in the release plan to create or
>>>> update all jira issues that concerns flickers. It would allow us to keep
>>>> some information about the liveness of our flickers.
>>>>
>>>> So second question, do you agree on that?
>>>
>>> Depends what it exactly means. Have some dedicated jira field to
>>> indicate when you saw it last ? Comment that you just saw that test
>>> failing again ?
>> My suggestion was about a dedicated JIRA field if possible.
>
> So, ok if I create a new custom field in JIRA for flickers, called "Date of last
failure for flicker”?
[snip]
I don’t see how it’ll help since it’ll never be up to date, and the old value will remain
making us think it’s not been flickering for a long time.
In my mind the idea is not so much to use this field as a criteria to
close an issue but as a criteria to not close it.