On 22 Feb 2016 at 15:27:04, vincent(a)massol.net
(vincent@massol.net(mailto:vincent@massol.net)) wrote:
On 19 Feb 2016 at 15:20:09, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica)
(valicac@gmail.com(mailto:valicac@gmail.com)) wrote:
Hi Vincent,
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 10:19 PM, vincent(a)massol.net
wrote:
Hi Caty,
On 17 Feb 2016 at 17:44:56, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) (valicac(a)gmail.com
(mailto:valicac@gmail.com)) wrote:
Fixed the links
On Wed, Feb 17, 2016 at 6:35 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <
valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This proposal wants to improve the current download page layout found
at
>
http://enterprise.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Download
>
>
> The proposal is here:
>
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/
>
> bin/view/Proposal/
>
> XWikiOrgDownload2Layout
>
>
> The proposal splits the current information into multiple pages
(version,
> type). Make sure you read the
"Changes" section from the proposal.
>
> Let me know what you think.
I really like the new Download page (LTS, Stable, Dev). Much nicer and
cleaner than the current version! :)
However I’m not sure about the second download page with the Local,
Server, Debian boxes. There are several issues for me:
* The Local packagings can be used on a server
* The server packagings can be used locally
* The Debian packaging can be used both locally and on a server
So currently the documentation pages use terms like "Standalone
distribution" and "WAR package". For me these naming are not
user-friendly
and I might not know what the acronym stands for or what standalone means.
That's why I suggested Local and Server, since they are more simplistic but
yes maybe they are not truly correct. Maybe we can iterate more on the
naming but we need an improvement here since we want to encourage "local"
testing even for not so technical users/administrators.
I understand what you wanted but indeed I find the new terms even more confusing :)
For me we should think in term of “Using XWiki”. To use XWiki the user has 2 choices:
A) Download and install it locally (wherever he’s installing the download from, could be
a laptop, could be a server machine, etc). This is usually referred as “on premises” by
comparison to using it as a service (cloud, saas, etc).
B) Use it as a service.
For A) the options we have are:
* Demo packagings: those are the options from
http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/AdminGuide/InstallationStandalone. They include a
pre-installed HSQLDB Database and a Jetty container Specifically the following
installers/packagings:
** the EXE packaging,
** the ZIP packaging,
** the JAR packaging
FWIW Denis suggested the name “Personal packagings”. So we have 2 options so far:
- Demo packagings (clearly shows they not for production)
- Personal packagings (hints that they are for personal use only, ie single user wiki)
I think I prefer Demo. WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
* Production-level packagings:
** Debian packaging (all in one installation that includes MySQL and Tomcat)
** The WAR (the user needs to install both a Servlet Container and a Database and deploy
the WAR in the Servlet Container)
* Other packagings/setup that are not supported by the XWiki Core Dev Team:
** tutorials
** yaourt packaging
For B) the options we have are:
* Demo on playground.xwiki.org(http://playground.xwiki.org)
* myxwiki.org(http://myxwiki.org) for non-profit organizations and individuals. Free but
no warranties in term of uptime or support. Used as a real-world test platform by the
XWiki Core Dev Team to test the latest versions of XWiki.
* Cloud and Hosting offers from companies helping develop the XWiki open source project
(the companies listed at
http://www.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/Support#HProfessionalSupport and defined by the
xwiki.org(http://xwiki.org) governance at
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/Governance):
** From XWiki SAS: XCS (
http://info.xwiki.com/xcs-demo-request.html) or dedicated hosting
(
http://www.xwiki.com/en/services/hosting)
** From Softec or EsPresto AG: link to their web sites
It would be nice that a user wants to use XWiki he lands on a page showing the 2 options:
install on premises and hosting/cloud solutions. Then he can drill down and if he wants to
install on premises, be able to select from the various download options.
WDYT?
Thanks
-Vincent
> > * Server is not a good differentiator since XWiki is a Server app even if
> > you install it locally ;)
> > * BTW it’s misising the other tutorials and other packagings (the yaourt
> > one for example)
> >
>
> To be honest I didn't know what you were referring to until I found
>
http://platform.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/AdminGuide/Installation#HUsingyaou…
> When I did the re-design I took the information from the Download page and
> the "yaourt" one is missing.
> In order to fix this we could modify the third column called now "Debian
> Installation" into a other operating systems ways of installing ( or
> another name ) and list there links towards the Debian and Arch Linux
> install documentation.
>
>
> > * And even more important it’s also missing Cloud solutions. I’d really
> > like if we could list the various cloud solutions offered by companies
> > participating to the xwiki development (and possibly list
myxwiki.org too
> > but if we list it, we need to put visible disclaimer since it’s a test farm
> > with no warranties and for non-business/personal projects only).
> >
>
> IMO this should be a total different page, let's call it "Test Drive
XWiki"
> or "Try XWiki" or "Evaluate XWiki" that could showcase
Playground, MyXWiki
> and other Cloud solutions, but this should be part of a different proposal
> than the Download page (which lists versions and install methods).
> Currently I didn't tackled this proposal yet.
>
>
> >
> > So maybe we shouldn’t discriminate between Local, Server, Debian but maybe
> > instead between “On-Premises” and “Cloud”, WDYT?
> >
>
> I'm not sure what "On Premises" means although I know it's an used
term,
> but I don't find it very clear and not sure if it describes well the zip,
> war, etc. options.
>
> The problem is that we list the "Local, Server, Debian" install options
> after you selected the version you want to download. So I find it a bit odd
> for an user to be convinced that he wants to download XWiki, select his
> version and then be presented with the Cloud Solutions. Cloud solutions
> should be part of an evaluation step, before and independent of the
> download step.
>
> Thanks,
> Caty
>
>
> > Thanks
> > -Vincent
> >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Caty