No replies yet...
On Oct 11, 2007 5:33 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu.dumitriu(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Hi,
We should reintroduce the Resolved state in the issue workflow, and
it
should work like this:
- When closing an issue, it will go in the Resolved state, which
means
that somebody provided a fix and it is committed in the repository.
- Somebody else can test (manually) that the issue is indeed
fixed/implemented, and it works as expected. If no, then it goes
back
to Open, otherwise it goes to Verified.
- When all the needed tests and documentation are written, the issue
can be closed completely, entering the Closed state.
This should improve the way we write code, meaning that we don't
just
commit some quick fix code which nobody sees, and claim that the
issue
is fixed. Right now we're trying to do peer reviewing either by
first
attaching patches to the issue and have somebody review it, or by
hoping that someone is reading the commit mails and notices if
something is wrong. We should never make a release that has issues
in
the Resolved state, as it has unverified code, probably with missing
documentation and proper tests. We should reserve a few days before
each release for moving any Resolved issue to the Closed state, by
verifying, testing and documenting it.
Verifying issues can be done by outsiders, too, so we could involve
the community more. Perhaps it would be a good idea to require two
verifiers before moving the issue to verified, as testing on
different
systems can spot some bugs, like the full screen editor not working
in
Safari issue.
Sergiu
--
http://purl.org/net/sergiu
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org