8 Oct
2013
8 Oct
'13
6:25 p.m.
I think there is a misunderstanding due the the first mail that was
not very clear.
What Vincent did here is not something that creates XWiki
distributions (for example XE), it's something that create XE
distributions (something that inherits XE).
On Tue, Oct 8, 2013 at 6:12 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
On 10/08/2013 11:15 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
--
Thomas Mortagne
On Oct 8, 2013, at 5:07 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Should that really be a module of xwiki-enterprise? To me it looks like
a tool, which could have been used to create xwiki-enterprise itself.
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs On 10/08/2013 10:58 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Except that all modules in enterprise start with xwiki-enterprise so that would be
xwiki-enterprise-product-archetype and I believe it's overkill since there's only
1 archetype ATM.
If everyone thinks that xwiki-enterprise-product-archetype is better than
xwiki-enterprise-archetype, I'll change it.
On Oct 8, 2013, at 4:21 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu <sergiu(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
> On 10/07/2013 11:23 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
>> Hi devs,
>>
>> I'd like to add an archetype module in xwiki-enterprise so that users can
easily extend XE to create their own distributions.
>>
>> It'll generate a multimodule project with *-web, *-ui, *-data and
*-distribution modules (and possibly installers in a second version).
>>
>> I remember some users asking for this (e.g. Fabio) and I have the need myself
now.
>>
>> WDYT?
>>
>
> +1, but the name should be more generic, like
you mean less generic, not more :)
No, I mean more generic. xwiki-enterprise is too specific, it means
exactly the XWiki Enterprise product.
> xwiki-distribution-archetype, because
that's what it builds, custom
> distributions built on top of XWiki, not enterprises for XWiki.
I chose voluntarily to not have xwiki-enterprise-distribution-archetype because it
doesn't build distributions. It generates all modules to build a product based on XE.
Right, "product" is the right term. I used "distribution" as a
synonym
of "product" (like a Linux distro) not with the
"packaging/installer"
sense that's used in the actual XE modules.
So, +1 for xwiki-product-archetype.