6 Oct
2016
6 Oct
'16
2:25 p.m.
I agree to not show the install count for bundled applications since it's
an artificial number.
On a side note: I also think the mentioned apps (Tour, Templates, CKEditor)
since they are bundled, they should not be recommended since they are
bundled. So users (of new versions - which are the ones we support and
optimize for) will have them preinstalled.
So we will have some special rules for bundled extensions. Since by
definition, being bundled, means they are used and recommended.
Thanks,
Caty
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 1:01 PM, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 12:01 PM, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
s/recode/recording/
--
Thomas Mortagne
--
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 12:00 PM, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 11:02 AM, Eduard Moraru <enygma2002(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> First of all, I`m not sure what "show active installs" checkbox you`re
>> mentioning, since I looked and found no such option anywhere on e.x.o.
nor
>> on EM.
>
> It's not in the UI. Look at object editor.
>
>>
>> Re e.x.o, why not simply adding a boolean "Bundled" column in the
livetable
>> which could be a standard Yes/No/All
select (and maybe which would
even
>> filter to No by default)?
>>
>> I would find this clearer and more flexible than to no longer display
the
>> install count for some extensions. I
would prefer to keep recording it
>> because, at some point, bundled extensions can be un-bundled or
viceversa,
> so
the numbers would be relevant.
This option have nothing to do with the recode. That's active install
job and you can't really disable this.
>>
>> On the same topic: AFAIU, we currently display the *total* install
count,
>> but what about displaying a
*relative*/*recent* install count, i.e.
for the
>> last 1 (or 3 or 6) month(s)? This would
allow people to sort by
"popular"
>> extensions instead of always seeing
"dinosaur" extensions (like the
ones
>> you are trying to hide will eventually
become), from a time when they
were
>> popular but which are no longer relevant.
Of course, we could take this
>> further and display on the extension's page an install graph, similar
what
>> the Jenkins plugins repository does with
its "Usage" graphs (ex [1]).
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Eduard
>>
>> ----------
>> [1] https://wiki.jenkins-ci.org/display/JENKINS/Groovy+
Postbuild+Plugin
>>
>> On Thu, Oct 6, 2016 at 10:48 AM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
>>
>>> Hi devs,
>>>
>>> Question: do we agree to disable "show active installs" for
extensions
>>> bundled in XE on e.x.o? (if I remember correctly that's why thomas
>>> introduced this checkbox but I want to make sure we have the same
opinion)
>>>
>>> The idea is not to drown the install figures with bundled extensions
which
>>> are not chosen by users (they get
them by default).
>>>
>>> Right now we still have a few extensions that are bundled and have
their
>>> install count displayed. I can fix it
but I want to make sure first.
>>>
>>> Also we need to decide what to do with contrib extensions bundled in
XE.
>>> For example:
>>> - Tour app
>>> - CKEditor
>>> - Templates app
>>>
>>> I think we should also disable their active install count, following
the
>>> same rule, even though they can also
be installed by themselves in
older
> versions of XE.
>
> WDYT?
>
> To see it:
> http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/#|t=
> extensions&p=1&l=30&s=installedCount&d=desc
>
> Thanks
> -Vincent
>
> _______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> devs(a)xwiki.org
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne