18 Apr
2009
18 Apr
'09
12:32 p.m.
Vincent Massol wrote:
On Apr 18, 2009, at 11:29 AM, Jerome Velociter wrote:
Exact, that's why I could not use it for pages in XWS :)
Note that those fields are still what ultimately should be used to
replace the inline mode, I believe. Inline mode does not have any sense
for a page without XObject(s). What is to resolve is what should be done
for pages with several XObjects with such fields not empty
(concatenation of all XObjects classes default(View|Edit)Sheet sheets ?)
Vincent Massol wrote:
in XWikiDocument thre are 2 fields:
* a template field
* a defaultTemplate field
The defaultEditSheet/defaultViewSheet are in the BaseClass java class,
i.e. they are used for XObjects. I don't see how they could be used
for the main document's view or edit actions. On Apr 18, 2009, at 11:01 AM, Jerome Velociter
wrote:
No, this already exists. Maybe there is
no API to set it in
XWikiDocument, but check the XML of an exported doc, you'll see it. Hi,
Vincent Massol wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We need to have automatic inline edit mode for XWiki Syntax 2.0
> (http://jira.xwiki.org/jira/browse/XWIKI-2891)
>
> I'd like to implement this quickly since it prevents to use the
> xwiki
> syntax 2.0 as the default syntax (for ex if you create a user in
> 2.0
> syntax and click edit you'll edit it in wysiwyg mode instead of
> inline
> mode).
>
> A quick solution I have:
>
> * Use the XWikiDocument template field to set the sheet to use
Don't you rather mean the field "defaultEditSheet" ?
I couldn't
find that field in XWikiDocument. Do you mean
introducing a
new field for this? (I'm +1 for that)
Any idea what defaultTemplate is used for? (I'll research it, just
asking in case you already know).
Isn't defaultTemplate a way to force an equivalent of
&template=XWiki.MyTemplate ? I'm not sure of this...
Jerome.
Thanks
-Vincent
And
I think it is also already usable (at least in syntax 1.0), XWiki will
use the document indicated in this field (if present) as the sheet in
edit mode. There is an equivalent for view mode : defaultViewSheet.
This is for the case you don't want to use the content to
that. For
example, I used it in workspaces since I wanted the content to be
editable with the (old) WYSIWYG that potentially would alter the
#includeForm statement. (And I also did not wanted to expose this
statement to users). Now, I probably could have used defaultEditSheet
and defaultViewSheet instead, and thus have my presentation code for
edit and view in the wiki rather than in the skin (or templates/
folder).
So to sum up:
- "template" is for using a specific .vm to render the document
against
(it will supersede view.vm or edit.vm)
- "defaultViewSheet" or "defaultEditSheet" is to force a wiki
document
as sheet in view or edit mode
Jerome.
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs template
is for
choosing the .vm to render the document against IIRC
> * When a page has the template field set, when the user clicks on
> the
> edit button it goes automatically in inline edit mode
The template field set to what ? This sounds like a hack and will
prevent using the template field for what its meant for.
I wasn't sure what it
was meant for since it's never been used. I'm
still unsure what it's for since you can put the way to display the
page in the page content itself so I'm unsure why you'd need a
template specified. But I'm ok to use an editTemplate (and rename
template to
viewTemplate
- after I understand why we need it).
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs > * Add a new field in the information edit
panel to set the template
> (only for advanced users I think)
>
> WDYT?
I think we'd better not make a too quick decision on that, since
if we
don't make a sound choice, it potentially will create us more work
for
the moment we really refactor/remove the inline mode.
I would say "defaultEditSheet" is our best option, but I have to
think
more about it. Feedback from JV and Ludovic would help, they both
worked
on such refactoring of the inline mode.
The point of this email is to make people
react and so that we come
to
a quick conclusion. I've been trying to push this issue for months
now
without success so I'm now going to handle it and implement it
myself.
We also need this fast since otherwise we can't set the default
syntax
to xwiki 2.0.
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs