26 Oct
2015
26 Oct
'15
3:36 p.m.
On 26 Oct 2015 at 15:25:17, Eduard Moraru
(enygma2002@gmail.com(mailto:enygma2002@gmail.com)) wrote:
Hi,
It would be really nice to get some more feedback on this, since we need it
for 7.3M2 (to fix the failing tests).
On my side I’m +1 for both proposals.
Thanks
-Vincent
Thanks,
Eduard
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 3:31 PM, Eduard Moraru wrote:
+1 for extracting it. We currently need this in
the administration module,
for the template provider UI.
IMO, xwiki-platform-tree is basically about the tree widget... almost
nothing to do with XWiki's data model. In my eyes, this looks like the
technology, not the domain.
xwiki-platform-index makes much more sense to me, since it defines the
domain, which can present an index of documents using various technologies:
livetable (documents), tree (documentTree), intepretive dance, etc.
+1 for proposal 2 (since we agreed that we were grouping modules by domain
and not by technology).
Thanks,
Eduard
P.S.: We could also extract an xwiki-platform-index-livetable (or
something with -macro-document if we want to make it about the name of the
macro instead of the presentation technology) for the Documents macro
(XWiki.DocumentsMacro), currently also bundled in index-ui.
On Fri, Oct 23, 2015 at 3:25 PM, vincent(a)massol.net
wrote:
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs Hi devs,
I see that the DocumentTree macro is used more and more in several places
(as it should) and I’d like to propose to extract the DocumentTree macro
from the Index App.
Proposal 1:
===========
xwiki-platform-tree
|_ xwiki-platform-tree-generic
|_ ...
|_ xwiki-platform-tree-document
|_ ...
Proposal 2:
===========
xwiki-platform-index
|_ xwiki-platform-index-ui
|_ xwiki-plarform-index-tree
|_ …
WDYT? Any other proposal?
Personally I prefer proposal 1.
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs