21 Aug
2014
21 Aug
'14
1:31 p.m.
Hello,
I'm +1 for this proposal.
I like 2.1.1, 2.2.1 & 2.2.3, but if I were to pick one I'd go with 2.2.1.
Thanks,
Manuel
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 1:29 PM, Guillaume "Louis-Marie" Delhumeau <
gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
2014-08-21 11:00 GMT+02:00 vincent(a)massol.net
<vincent(a)massol.net>et>:
change
That’s a good point, we need to agree which skin we’re discussing. AFAIK
we’re discussing Flamingo which is NOT a public web site skin. When we do a
To me Flamingo can be used for a public wiki (without the app bar), which
has not the same meaning as "public website" which is not necessary a
"wiki" (see:
http://extensions.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Extension/Leiothrix+Skin ).
> Thanks
> -Vincent
> > > IMO it's more important
to be better displayed when you want to
> > > create a new translation, than when you read one.
> > > > > Regarding the
flag to represent languages you can read this comment
> with
> > > additional information about why we wouldn't do it like that
> > > >
http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-9512?focusedCommentId=77895&page=com…
> > > > > Thanks,
> > > Caty
> > > > > > > On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 9:37 PM, Denis Gervalle
wrote:
> > > > > > Hi Cathy,
> > > > > > > 2.1.1
is the one I prefer, 2.1.2 is also good but the separation
> between
> > > > language should be more clear, and it is less easy to see the
active
> > > >
Regarding the UI language, 1.1 is fine, but maybe a bit large.
Having
> > > >
Thanks,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 5:34 PM, Ecaterina
Moraru (Valica) <
> > > > valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > Hi
devs,
> > > > > > > >
> We have http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-10745 (Improve the
> display
> > > of
> > > > > available languages in Flamingo) which is related to
> > > > > http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-6402 (Separate Interface
> language
> > > and
> > > > > page language settings)
> > > > > > > >
> While in Flamingo we could just make the language links look
> better,
> > > > > without changing the functionality, for the future, the
separation
> is
> > > > > something we might want to tackle, that's why I've
created this
> > > proposal
> > > > > page
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/InterfaceAndContentLanguage…
> > > > > > > >
> I am interested in what you think about the variants.
> > > > > > > >
> Thanks,
> > > > > Caty
>
_______________________________________________
> devs mailing list
> devs(a)xwiki.org
> http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
On 21 Aug 2014 at 10:57:36, Guillaume Louis-Marie Delhumeau (
gdelhumeau@xwiki.com(mailto:gdelhumeau@xwiki.com)) wrote:
change
Hi
2014-08-21 9:58 GMT+02:00 Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) :
> Hi,
> First of all we need to decide how
prominent we want this
functionality to
> > be.
> > I would make it more transparent, since theoretically you should > your
language preference just once (in the Administration, and per
user)
> and all the pages should be displayed
according to that preference.
This is
> > not something that need to be highly visible and that you would every day.
It's not true on a public wiki (like Wikipedia). public web site skin we would need to take this
into consideration
indeed.
> > one. I
> > > have no fear about the scaling issue, even heavily multilingual
site
like
> > > those of the European Commission use such enumeration without
issue.
And
effectively
> as
> > Guillaume said, it is really rare to have more than a few languages
> anyway.
> > Other proposal implies multiple click/touch for the same purpose,
which
> > is
> > > bad IMO for content. It is also important to only display > > > available languages, but with an
enum, it could be also good to
have
the
> > > option to also display unavailable one greyed, so language keep
their
> > > > location on screen.
> > > > > only
> > > initial in the bar would be better IMO. Having also a more fancy
> > solution,
> > > like what I have done with bluebird (see http://softec.lu), could
be
> > > nice
> > > > to have as well... or a easy way to customize it that way with an
> > > > extension.
> > >