13 Aug
2011
13 Aug
'11
10:30 a.m.
On Aug 13, 2011, at 8:18 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
On 08/12/2011 05:32 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
What about retired/? (see my mail on the other thread about a proposal for that).
On Aug 11, 2011, at 7:35 PM, Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
Done.
All that remains in the contrib SVN repository is Jerome's Bespin
integration, waiting for him to move it out. On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 3:45 AM, Vincent
Massol<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
big +1 for everything under a big repository and under xwiki-contrib.
That makes the most sense to me since:
* it makes it easy to find a location for it: xwiki-contrib/sandbox
* it shows a difference between "promoted" projects and sandbox ones
* it fits well since in sandbox projects don't need releases and thus don't need
their own repos
>> There are still a few loose ends. For example have we finished moving
stuff from http://svn.xwiki.org/svnroot/xwiki/contrib/ ?
>
> Not yet, so far it was done as needed. Should we move all of them ASAP?
I think so, so that we can really remove SVN and avoid all confusion. We
need to decide what we do with "retired" projects. Some xwiki-retired
organization on github or simply inside xwiki-contrib and just mention the
"retired" in a top level README?
I moved everything under contrib/projects to xwiki-contrib, each project in
its own repository.
I moved everything under contrib/retired to a single big repository on
xwiki-contrib.
Things under contrib/people should be migrated by their owners.
I'm not sure what to do with the things in contrib/sandbox. Everything in
one big repository, or each project separated? After that, the only active thing left in the whole
SVN repository would
be Curriki, but I'm not sure they want to move yet.
We still need to remove from the SVN repo stuff we've moved out.
Thanks
-Vincent
--
Sergiu Dumitriu
http://purl.org/net/sergiu/