Re: [xwiki-devs] [Vote][Proposal] New Skin/ColorTheme Improvements for XE 3.4

wrote:

I have a question regarding VarB : When you say "wait for a new complete skin", you mean something completely different than the proposal in VarA ? If yes, then I would say, let's go for VarA, but do the new skin in 4.x anyway. VarA could then be the "finalized" form of colibri (the moment we say we don't make it evolve anymore except small things/bug fixes). I don't think the problems you mention for VarA are blocker, the already exists in the current state anyway. They are definitely things we should sort out, and if we are working on a new skin, that can be the ideal time. WDYT ? PS: and yes, VarA looks great, it makes the skin much less "aggressive". Jerome On Fri, Dec 16, 2011 at 8:24 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) <valicac(a)gmail.com> wrote: with > something new. Since (and long before) we dropped support for IE6 and

> (XE 3.2) I wanted to add some CSS3 enhancement to our default skin: > shadows, gradients, round corners, etc. So this is a good time to make

> proposal that integrates some CSS3 (gradients on menus, panels, tabs, > buttons, forms; text-shadows; box-shadows; border-radius;) and a new > ColorTheme into Colibri skin: > http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Improvements/34Proposal > > There are 3 directions that can be voted for this proposal: > > *Var A:* Integrate the proposed Skin improvements and the new

> into platform > Demo at

> > *Var B: *Don't integrate anything in the 3.4 timeframe and wait for a

> complete skin in 4.x = Current skin + default ColorTheme (no changes) > Demo at http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Drafts/WebHome > > *Var C:* Integrate just the new proposed ColorTheme that will replace

> current DefaultColorTheme > Demo at http://incubator.myxwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Standards/WebHome > > > > *Important remarks when making a decision:* > > *Var B* and *Var C *does not involve any changes, problems or

> from the current Colibri skin. > > Advantages for *Var A*: > - Tested on IE7, IE8, IE9, Opera 11, Chrome 16, Firefox 8, Safari 5 and > works beautifully. > - Uses CSS3 declarations that makes the skin more nice (gradients,

skin > needs shades for the gradients (this means the existing ColorThemes > variables will be either used in ways they were not intended or they

"[Discussion] > Problematic ColorTheme > extensibility"<http://xwiki.markmail.org/thread/ex6fgou6fl6vjwfr> > - The CSS will become even more invalid (right now we have a > -moz-border-radius and a word-wrap non valid declarations), but the new > code contains 154 declarations for the gradients (covering > -moz-linear-gradient, -webkit-gradient, -webkit-linear-gradient, > -o-linear-gradient, -ms-linear-gradient, linear-gradient and filter: > progid:DXImageTransform.Microsoft.gradient proprietary declarations).

> invalidity comes because the proprietary declarations are not yet W3C > standard (and will not ever be a standard). The proposed standard W3C > declaration (linear-gradient) is not yet supported consistently and > correctly by browsers, but when it will become standard we can remove

-- Jérôme Velociter Winesquare http://www.winesquare.net/ _______________________________________________ devs mailing list devs(a)xwiki.org http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs