30 Sep
2015
30 Sep
'15
10:53 a.m.
I think what I like best is some option in the refactoring API to
indicate that you want to delete only final documents in the space (so
skipping space home page and spaces).
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:29 AM, vincent(a)massol.net <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
On 30 Sep 2015 at 10:28:54, Thomas Mortagne
(thomas.mortagne@xwiki.com(mailto:thomas.mortagne@xwiki.com)) wrote:
--
Thomas Mortagne
On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 10:22 AM,
vincent(a)massol.net wrote:
Good point, that’s a no go IMO.
Thanks
-Vincent
Hi Denis,
On 30 Sep 2015 at 09:49:28, Denis Gervalle (dgl@softec.lu(mailto:dgl@softec.lu)) wrote:
The problem with that is the forced /Data/ part of the URL which is
really not nice. Well, I have not yet look in details the new
features for page
manipulation, but I was wondering if there will be a simple way to delete
application data without deleting the application itself with the model you
propose ?
I know there is already issue with that about the WebHome which
is usually an entry point to the application, but deleting a space was
possible. If the code is nested under the data, isn't it an issue. It looks
like the opposite of the general way (not xwiki way, but in application in
general), where the code abstract more or less the location of the data and
is the "main" part.
So, I am not sure actually, that this is the best way. Maybe code and data
should be side by side under a entry point documents ?
You mean something like:
MyApp
|_ Data/
|_ Code/
|_ WebHome
(Instead of leaving it free for apps to decide where to put the data they generate)
We could indeed standardize on the location of where an app puts the data it generates in
a “Data" space. > Even without this, to remove an app you’d
simply remove the Code/ space (+ the WebHome).
>
> So your proposal of a standardized Data directory doesn’t contradict my proposal,
it’s actually an additional proposal, so I guess you agree about the 2 rules? (you didn’t
mention anything about rule 2).
>
> Thanks!
> -Vincent
>
>> On Wed, Sep 30, 2015 at 8:22 AM, vincent(a)massol.net
>> wrote:
>>
>> > Ping! There’s only Thomas and Gaby who answered so far :)
>> >
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > -Vincent
>> >
>> >
>> > On 27 Sep 2015 at 21:19:43, vincent(a)massol.net (vincent(a)massol.net) wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi devs,
>> >
>> > Following our implementation of NS/NP in 7.2 I’d like to propose 2 new
>> > best practices for app dev that we would list at
>> >
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/ApplicationDevelopmentBestPra…
>> >
>> > 1) New rule 1: “Code” subspace
>> >
>> > Current text:
>> > * Generally, put all your pages in a single space dedicated for the
>> > application you're developing (e.g. Faq, Scheduler, IRC,
AppWithinMinutes,
>> > etc). The name must be as short as possible while still being
>> > understandable of course and without overusing abbreviations.
>> >
>> > New version:
>> > * Generally, put all your pages in a single space dedicated for the
>> > application you're developing (e.g. Faq, Scheduler, IRC,
AppWithinMinutes,
>> > etc). The name must be as short as possible while still being
>> > understandable of course and without overusing abbreviations.
>> > * Technical pages should be put in a subspace named “Code”
>> >
>> > Note: this rule can only be applied for new applications for now since the
>> > EM doesn’t know how to follow renames currently so for example if I move
>> > pages from the FAQCode space to the FAQ.Code space, when EM upgrades the
>> > app, it’ll display all pages in FAQCode as deleted (basically it considers
>> > all pages in FAQ.Code as new pages and pages in FAQCode as deleted pages).
>> > Note: I’ve created http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-12622 for this.
>> >
>> > 2) New rule 2:
>> >
>> > * Technical pages without children must be terminal pages.
>> >
>> > WDYT?
>> >
>> > Thanks
>> > -Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs