Thanks,
Eduard
On Mon, Sep 8, 2014 at 2:17 PM, Ecaterina Moraru (Valica) > > wrote:
My vote goes to:
+1 to support IE11(IE10) for Flamingo
-1 to support IE8 for Flamingo
+1 to support IE8 for Colibri
My rationale:
- Flamingo should be viewed as a modern skin and should be displayed on
modern browsers.
- Although Bootstrap states that it support IE8/IE9 (see
http://getbootstrap.com/getting-started/#support-ie8-ie9 ) the support is
partial. Some properties are not fully supported and also you need a
third-party JS dependency.
- We will dedicate development time to fix issues on a browser that will
die soon (and as you said is not supported by Microsoft and I don't even
mention other companies)
- IE8 works with Flamingo, but is not perfect (for me supporting a browser
means assuring all the functionality is working and displaying perfectly on
it). If an user really needs a perfect skin to work with IE8 they should
pick Colibri
Thanks,
Caty
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 6:11 PM, Thomas Mortagne > > >
wrote:
On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Thomas Mortagne
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 4:59 PM, Thomas Mortagne
> wrote:
>> Ok let me rephrase that a bit, what I would like to apply is what MS
>> plan to upgrade: "only the most current version of Internet Explorer
>
> s/upgrade/apply/
>
>> available for a supported operating system". So based on what's on
>>
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/lifecycle.
Right now this mean dropping support for 8 and 9.
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 4:57 PM, Thomas Mortagne
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 4:45 PM, vincent(a)massol.net <
vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 4 Sep 2014 at 16:43:42, Thomas Mortagne (
thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com
(mailto:thomas.mortagne@xwiki.com)) wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> IMO we should modify
>>>>>
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/BrowserSupportStrategy
>>>>> with something like "we
support what Microsoft support". It's
simple
>>>>> and easy to defend IMO (why
the hell would we do what Microsoft
does
>>>>> not ?).
>>>>
>>>> I don’t like this too much because there are various levels of
support. General support and the companies take specific IE support for
older versions.
>>>
>>> I'm talking about general support (what MS call "mainstream
support"
>>> on
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/lifecycle) of course
>>> since that's what we are talking about here.
>>>
>>>>
>>>> And then I don’t necessarily agree to support old versions of IE
even
if MS support them. For me it’s our choice to
make.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks
>>>> -Vincent
>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 4:34 PM, Guillaume "Louis-Marie"
Delhumeau
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>> > +1 for IE9/10/11
>>>>> > +0 for IE8 (there is a lot of users but even Microsoft does
not
support it!)
>>>>> >
>>>>> >
>>>>> > 2014-09-04 16:11 GMT+02:00 Thomas Mortagne :
>>>>> >
>>>>> >> On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Thomas Mortagne
>>>>> >> wrote:
>>>>> >> > What about supporting what Microsoft support ? That
means not
IE9/10/11
>>>>> >> only.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> Remove the "not" of course.
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > See
>>>>> >>
http://blogs.msdn.com/b/ie/archive/2014/08/07/stay-up-to-date-with-internet…
>>>>> >> .
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > IMO we should not do more that the own browser editor
does.
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > On Thu, Sep 4, 2014 at 3:40 PM, vincent(a)massol.net
>>>>> >> wrote:
>>>>> >> >> Reviving this thread since we need to decide and
lots of
committers
>>>>> >> haven’t voted yet!
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> I’ve updated
>>>>> >>
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/BrowserSupportStrategy with
>>>>> >> recent market
share.
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> Note that there are various other sources and they
don’t seem
to show
>>>>> >> similar data:
>>>>> >> >> -
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usage_share_of_web_browsers
>>>>> >> >> -
http://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parts_de_march%C3%A9_des_navigateurs_web
>>>>> >> >> -
http://www.w3counter.com/globalstats.php
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> However I think they all show that if we wish to
support 80%
of users
>>>>> >> we have to support about the 10 top browsers used and
AFAICS
this
includes:
>>>>> >> >> - IE8/9/10/11
>>>>> >> >> - FF latest
>>>>> >> >> - Chrome latest
>>>>> >> >> - Safari latest
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> It seems market shared for IE8/9 are still high.
However IE10
is less
>>>>> >> high (probably because those who upgraded to it quickly
upgraded
to IE11)?
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> So far we have the following votes:
>>>>> >> >> - Andrea: +1 to support IE10/11
>>>>> >> >> - Vincent: +1 to support IE10/11
>>>>> >> >> - Marius: +1 to support IE11, +0 to support
IE8/9/10
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> Thanks
>>>>> >> >> -Vincent
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >> >> On 10 Jun 2014 at 09:08:43, vincent(a)massol.net (
vincent(a)massol.net
>>>>> >> (mailto:vincent@massol.net)) wrote:
>>>>> >> >>
>>>>> >> >>> Hi Andrea/all,
>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >>> On 10 Jun 2014 at 08:46:45, Andreea Popescu (
andreea.popescu(a)xwiki.com
>>>>> >> (mailto:andreea.popescu@xwiki.com)) wrote:
>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >>> > Hello all,
>>>>> >> >>> >
>>>>> >> >>> > Following the "Start supporting IE10
and IE11" thread I’d
like to
>>>>> >> propose
>>>>> >> >>> > to vote if we will support IE10 and
IE11.
>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >>> FTR the thread in question is at
>>>>> >>
http://markmail.org/message/zjlbcfkl5cqnrwfk
>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >>> > The most important reasons for supporting
these versions
are:
>>>>> >> >>> >
>>>>> >> >>> > - Internet Explorer 8 and Internet
Explorer 9 are still
widely used
>>>>> >> by
>>>>> >> >>> > users, but many of them are currently
choosing to update
to
IE10 and
>>>>> >> IE11.
>>>>> >> >>> > - according to
netmarketshare.com
(Browsers -> Desktop
Share by
>>>>> >> Version)
>>>>> >> >>> > from a total of 100%, IE10 is used by
6.85% users and IE11
by 16.61%
>>>>> >> users.
>>>>> >> >>> > It’s true that IE10 is not as popular as
the older
versions
(IE8 -
>>>>> >> 20.85%
>>>>> >> >>> > and IE9 - 8.89%), but its usage
percentage is still
significant.
>>>>> >> >>> >
>>>>> >> >>> > Here’s my +1.
>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >>> On the above-mentioned thread Marius had
proposed to support
only the
>>>>> >> latest version of each browser, which is basically what
we’re
doing except
>>>>> >> for IE. The rationale is that it takes time to support all
browsers and the
>>>>> >> community can only do so much. Companies offering paid
services
on top of
>>>>> >> XWiki could support the other browser versions for their
customers.
>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >>> While I understand that, my POV is a bit
different: I’d like
that we
>>>>> >> support the top browsers/versions used by the majority of
people,
because I
>>>>> >> feel XWiki will be successful if the majority of people can
use
it without
>>>>> >> problems.
>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >>> Looking at the graph at
>>>>> >>
http://dev.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Community/BrowserSupportStrategy if
>>>>> >> we were to support at least the top 6 browser/versions we
would
cover 70%
>>>>> >> of the user base. For IE this means supporting IE8-11. Note
that
strangely
>>>>> >> IE8 is the top browser in market shares, way above most of
the
others… Not
>>>>> >> supporting it ATM would mean “loosing" 20%+ of users.
If we have
problems
>>>>> >> supporting, say the top 10 browsers, then we can drop to
top 6,
if that’s
>>>>> >> an issue, then to top 5, etc. ATM we’re supporting 5
browsers
and
with
>>>>> >> IE10-11, this would mean raising to 7 browsers. I propose
that
we
try it
>>>>> >> with the additional 2 browsers (IE10-11) and see if it’s a
burden
for us or
>>>>> >> it’s manageable.
>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >>> So there are 2 questions in here:
>>>>> >> >>> - Starting the support for IE10-11: I’m +1 for
that
>>>>> >> >>> - Deciding if we want to support only one
version for each
browser or
>>>>> >> instead support the highest browsers in marketshare. I’m +1
for
the
>>>>> >> marketshare approach.
>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >>> Thanks
>>>>> >> >>> -Vincent
>>>>> >> >>>
>>>>> >> >> _______________________________________________
>>>>> >> >> devs mailing list
>>>>> >> >> devs(a)xwiki.org
>>>>> >> >>
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> >
>>>>> >> > --
>>>>> >> > Thomas Mortagne
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >>
>>>>> >> --
>>>>> >> Thomas Mortagne
>>>>> >> _______________________________________________
>>>>> >> devs mailing list
>>>>> >> devs(a)xwiki.org
>>>>> >>
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>>>>> >>
>>>>> > _______________________________________________
>>>>> > devs mailing list
>>>>> > devs(a)xwiki.org
>>>>> >
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Thomas Mortagne
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> devs mailing list
>>>>> devs(a)xwiki.org
>>>>>
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> devs mailing list
>>>> devs(a)xwiki.org
>>>>
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Thomas Mortagne
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Thomas Mortagne
>
>
>
> --
> Thomas Mortagne
--
Thomas Mortagne
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org