30 Nov
2009
30 Nov
'09
11:03 a.m.
On Nov 30, 2009, at 10:10 AM, Vincent Massol wrote:
On Mon, Nov 30, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Fabio Mancinelli
<fabio.mancinelli(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Yes.
Thank you for the remark Vincent.
-Fabio
On Nov 30, 2009, at 3:08 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu
wrote:
Even if you're not using Components, passing the CM is still an
implementation details that should not be shown in a user-API
signature. If you're not using Components you'd pass it in the
constructor of your command.
Why do you pass the component manager around? Each component
implementation can declare a dependency on ComponentManager if it needs it.
Right.
It's a leftover because before I wasn't implementing commands as components.
+ String execute(ComponentManager
componentManager, String... arguments) throws Exception;
+}