1 Oct
2015
1 Oct
'15
4:14 p.m.
Hi,
thanks! Actually I kinda like it. There will be many menus only for people
who have a lot of rights :-)
Waiting for other people's opinions!
Thanks,
Guillaume
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 4:02 PM, Guillaume "Louis-Marie" Delhumeau <
gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Hi Guillaume.
I've added your idea to the proposal:
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/NestedMenuReorganization#H1…
Too me, there is too many menus in that case.
2015-10-01 14:12 GMT+02:00 Guillaume Lerouge <guillaume(a)xwiki.com>om>:
an
--
Guillaume Delhumeau (gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
Committer on the XWiki.org project
Hi,
one quick question (maybe it's dumb but it crossed my mind while looking
at
the proposals): what about implementing both a
"viewers" and a "cog"
button
(pushing the total to up to 5 buttons when you
have all possible rights)?
Could this make sense?
Thanks,
Guillaume
On Thu, Oct 1, 2015 at 12:57 PM, Guillaume "Louis-Marie" Delhumeau <
gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
> Hi.
>
> With 7.2, the content menus have changed a lot. The pain point is that
we
> have a too much crowded "more
actions" menu.
>
> Some discussions have already been done on this jira issue:
> http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-12587
>
> Caty have created a design page to re-organize the menus:
>
http://design.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Proposal/NestedMenuReorganization
I'm in favor of the solution 1.2.
So:
* -0 for solution 1.1 since the viewers are not what we use the most
(thanks to the extra tabs on the bottom) and it gives them too much
importance
* +1 for solution 1.2, even if we might encounter some difficulties
saying
> if an item is a base action or an advanced one.
>
> * 0 for option A (too much clicks), but on the other hand I don't have > alternative to propose.
> * +1 for option B. The jira issue is already created (
> http://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-12636) and I think nobody would be
> opposed to this.
> * +0 for option C. The browser already have this ability, and yes, it
> implies the hiding of the panels (thanks to some CSS we have).
However, I
> remember a client using this feature for a
convoluted use-case:
include a
> light wiki page in an other website via an
iframe. Anyway, we could
still
keep the
viewer but remove the link.
* +1 for D. I know that security through obscurity is not the best, but
it
disturbs me to let an access to the source code
of any wiki page,
including
not-well-done applications created by users.
Thanks,
Guillaume
--
Guillaume Delhumeau (gdelhumeau(a)xwiki.com)
Research & Development Engineer at XWiki SAS
Committer on the XWiki.org project
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs