Hello Vincent,
done, I attached the same page exported with the previous export, for
comparison.
On Sun, Oct 21, 2018 at 12:41 AM Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Hi Anca,
Thanks for working on this.
I wanted to quickly check it out so I went to the jira issue. What would
have been nice would have been to have two 2 PDF exports (one before and
one after), or simply 2 screenshots. Just to see visually what the changes
you made are looking like. But if you don’t have the time for this, don’t
worry, we can work with the text/PR. However, if you had some screenshots,
it could go in the Release notes to show the improvements to the user.
Thanks
-Vincent
On 21 Oct 2018, at 01:50, Anca Luca
<lucaa(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Hello devs,
I've whipped up quickly a couple of changes to the default PDF export of
the XWiki platform, to try to make it look a little nicer.
I created the issue here
https://jira.xwiki.org/browse/XWIKI-15761 and
the
pull request here
https://github.com/xwiki/xwiki-platform/pull/900 .
I would like to merge that into master unless somebody has something
against it, so please speak up now.
Longer story:
I know that "nicer" is a subjective term, and that a lot more can be done
to improve this default PDF export. My idea was that the current defaults
we have (for the font family, for example, or the information we display
in
the pdf header/footer and the style associated)
are not the result of an
actual studied choice, iirc they are just defaults that were set like
that
in the first version of that export and never
changed. Thus, I don't see
why we couldn't slightly change these defaults (without changing the
information displayed or risking regressions) to have a slightly better
looking default PDF, while still allowing all customizations just they
way
they worked before.
These modifications are not blocking nor replacing in any way the more
serious improvements that can be done on the PDF export, they're just
slightly improving the current defaults.
Best regards,
Anca