On 11/30/2010 04:46 PM, Jean-Vincent Drean wrote:
On Tue, Nov 30, 2010 at 3:37 PM, Denis
Gervalle<dgl(a)softec.lu> wrote:
+1
Also agreeing with JV regarding the WYSIWYG source vs Wiki editor confusion,
but this is probably another matter since users like me which does not use
the WYSIWYG editor do not want to suffer the load of the WYSIWYG editor just
to edit the source.
I understand your concern but the WYSIWYG tabs have been implemented
so that most of the loading (js execution that is) happens when
switching to the WYSIWYG tab. At least the first implementation was
working like this.
The implementation has changed a bit since. Anyway, the JavaScript code
(~500KB) still needs to be evaluated even if the part that is executed
afterwards, when Source is the default tab, is insignificant.
Still we should allow integrators to create a wiki without any wysiwyg editor and only a
wiki editor should they want this. If they want to embed a wiki for example in their own
application it has to be as lightweight as possible and not having to include any GWT jars
will make it lighter.
On my side, I still don't like very much at all this source tab since it's
confusing and it means we have 2 wiki editors. We need to decide something on this - in
another thread.... Who wants to start it?
Thanks
-Vincent