20 May
2011
20 May
'11
1:52 p.m.
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 11:50, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
--
Thomas Mortagne
On Fri, May 20, 2011 at 11:38, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
Just checked on Ubuntu and javadb is not part of sun-java6-jre so I
guess that means it's the same pretty much everywhere.
So this IDEA become -1 for me :)
On May 20, 2011, at 11:29 AM, Thomas Mortagne wrote:
From what I understood when java6 has been released it's part of java
6 standard, At least I never seen anything suggesting that it was only
in Sun/Oracle implementation. Hi devs,
Since we are now depending on java 6 I think we should probably change
our default all in one distribution to be based on javadb.
I'm not going to do any quality comparison between javadb and hsqldb
and this package is not supposed to be used in production anyway, the
only thing I'm interested in here is: javadb is embedded in java 6 so
using it instead of hdsqldb mean one jar less for the exact same
features.
WDYT ?
I'm not 100% sure. Is javadb available in all JDKs? Isn't it only avail in the
Oracle JDK?
Also is it avail in the JRE?
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs
--
Thomas Mortagne