16 Dec
2008
16 Dec
'08
9:40 p.m.
For me it's 3. whenever it makes sense (for example the JS/css code of
the RMUI should go in the admin app), and 5 when it does not (+ packing
different IC together when it makes sense, too).
Jerome.
Sergiu Dumitriu wrote:
Jean-Vincent Drean wrote:
On Tue, Dec 16, 2008 at 4:36 AM, Sergiu Dumitriu
<sergiu(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
Almost all UI elements of the current skin will have to be moved into
IC. For example:
- Keyboard shortcuts
- The bottom tabs behavior (comments, attachments, history, information)
- Uploading multiple attachments (like in GMail)
- AJAX suggest
- A future rich XClass editor
- Lightbox
- AJAX form validation
- Form Tooltips
- FullScreen edit
- Rights management
- Jump to any page
- Easy parent setting
Putting these in skins is wrong, since they are not reusable, and they
are not specific to only one skin. Hi devs,
While working on a UI feature that makes use of skin extensions (both
script and style), I was faced with a difficult choice: where to put
these extensions?
So, the choices are:
1. Stick to the past and put the code in Albatross, registering it in
platform-web/javascript.vm and stylesheet.vm.
2. Put the files as resource skin extensions inside xwiki-core.
3. Force the documents into an existing application, for example
administration or enterprise-wiki.
4. Create a new application for holding Interface Components.
5. Create a new application for each IC.
Currently, my preference is +1 for 5, with a +0 for 4 and -1 for the
rest. Here's some of my motivations:
I'll make the same votes : +1 for 5, with a +0 for 4 and -1 for the rest.
Since you're worried by the number of JIRA projects implied by 5) I'd
be curious to see a list of let's say 10 ICs you have in mind.
May be we could bundle ICs that are related in single modules.