30 May
2016
30 May
'16
12:55 p.m.
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 12:53 PM, Thomas Mortagne
<thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
--
Thomas Mortagne
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 9:25 AM, Marius Dumitru
Florea
<mariusdumitru.florea(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
And yes the way I understood it the rule about suffixes like
"application-", "api-" was only about top level modules for me. Then
I
find way cleaner you have consistent naming inside the same
repository.
On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
You are talking about the folder here while the discussion is more
about the module name IMO. We could indeed start another discussion
about the folder name but I don't think we should mix.
So you did prefixed all submodule with top level id too :) On 28 May 2016, at 15:06, Vincent Massol
<vincent(a)massol.net> wrote:
>
> On 28 May 2016, at 15:02, Thomas Mortagne <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com>
wrote:
>
> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 2:57 PM, Thomas Mortagne
> <thomas.mortagne(a)xwiki.com> wrote:
>> On Sat, May 28, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Vincent Massol <vincent(a)massol.net>
wrote:
>>> Hi devs,
>>>
>>> This is a reminder for naming the contrib projects. FYI there are
some
guidelines here:
http://contrib.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/#HChoosingthename
>>>
>>> For example for authenticators it’s authenticator-<xxx>.
>>>
>>> I see for example the android-authenticaitor module which should be
renamed authenticator-android IMO.
>>
>> It's not the same thing. This is an Android application and
>> implementing Android authentication API, so very different from other
>> authenticator-* which are authenticator you install in XWiki.
>>
>>>
>>> Regarding https://github.com/xwiki-contrib/oidc we need to decide
what
to do on 2 aspects (I’m taking the examle of oidc but this just serves
as an examle for the generic discussion):
>>>
>>> * How do we name repositories that contain various types of sub
modules? Just use the concept name as Thomas did for odidc? Or should be
define a prefix such as “all-oidc” or “other-oidc” or something else. I
think just the concept name is ok. WDYT?
>
> Just the concept is enough, especially if we are talking about
> prefixes like "all" and "other" won't don't indicate
anything.
>
>>>
>>> * odic contains 2 submodules right now: oidc-authenticator and
odic-provider. Should this be named authenticator-odic and provider-odic
instead to be in sync with
http://contrib.xwiki.org/xwiki/bin/view/Main/#HChoosingthename. I think
so. WDYT?
>
> I really don't think so. I prefer that submodules have consistent id
> naming in their own world. If we go this road then we should change
> the ids of most of the platform modules…
Contrib don’t have the same naming at all than xwiki github org.
For xwiki github org we have: xwiki-<module>-<submodules>
For contrib github org we have: <type>-<module>-<submodules>
We can reconcile this FTM by saying that the
naming rule of
<type>-<module>- is only for the top level name. And submodules always
follow the rule of <topmodulename>-<submodule>.
Repeating the top module name is redundant IMO, that's why I've used
application-ckeditor/ui and application-filemanager/api
https://github.com/xwiki-contrib/application-filemanager
https://github.com/xwiki-contrib/application-ckeditor
A related discussion
http://xwiki.475771.n2.nabble.com/VOTE-Remove-all-duplicated-information-fr…
Thanks,
Marius
--
Thomas Mortagne
Thanks
-Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs Thanks
-Vincent
>
>>>
>>> See also my other mail about the jira module refactorings.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>> -Vincent
_______________________________________________
devs mailing list
devs(a)xwiki.org
http://lists.xwiki.org/mailman/listinfo/devs